Perez v. Nidek Co.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Citation | 711 F.3d 1109 |
| Docket Number | No. 10–55577.,10–55577. |
| Parties | Robert PEREZ; Nancy Art; Brett Harbach, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. NIDEK CO., LTD.; Nidek Incorporated; Nidek Technologies Incorporated; Manjov V. Motwani, M.D.; Gary M. Kawesch, M.D.; Linda Vu, M.D.; Joseph Lee, M.D.; Farzad Yaghouti, M.D.; Randa M. Garrana, M.D.; Thomas S. Tooma, M.D.; Paul C. Lee, M.D.; Keith Liang, M.D.; Antoine L. Garabet, M.D.; William Ellis, M.D.; Gregg Feinerman, M.D.; Michael Rose, M.D.; John Kownacki, M.D.; Steven Ma, M.D.; Estate of Glenn A. Kawesch, M.D.; TLC Vision Corporation, dba TLC Laser Eye Center, Inc.; California Center for Refractive Surgery, a medical corporation; Laser Eye Center Medical Office, Inc.; Southwest Eye Care Center Inc.; Does, 1 through 1000, inclusive, Defendants–Appellees. |
| Decision Date | 25 March 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
196 cases
-
In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.
...chicken-and-egg question of whether class certification should be decided before standing.’ " Id. at 1069 (quoting Perez v. Nidek Co. , 711 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 2013) ). After reviewing relevant Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent, as well as decisions from various district courts and ......
-
Darisse v. Nest Labs, Inc.
...questions of standing are raised by way of a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See, e.g., Perez v. Nidek Co., 711 F.3d 1109, 1113-14 (9th Cir. 2013); Quinn v. Anvil Corp., 620 F.3d 1005, 1014-15 (9th Cir. 2010); see also Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555,......
-
Mehr v. Féderation Internationale fe Football Ass'n, Case No. 14–cv–3879–PJH
...of standing with at least as much specificity as is required in pleading the elements of a cause of action. See Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd., 711 F.3d 1109, 1113 (9th Cir.2013) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) ).The complaint is jurisdictiona......
-
Corbett v. PharmaCare U.S., Inc.
...on Buckman Co., v. Plaintiffs' Legal Comm. , 531 U.S. 341, 353, 121 S.Ct. 1012, 148 L.Ed.2d 854 (2001) and Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd. , 711 F.3d 1109, 1119-20 (9th Cir. 2013)8 , where both cases held that "fraud on the FDA" claims were impliedly preempted by the FDCA as amended by the MDA, bu......
Request a trial to view additional results