Perez v. State
| Docket Number | 55817 |
| Decision Date | 27 November 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
36 cases
-
State v. McDonnell
...the "the cognizable behavior patterns of sex offenders as steps toward the ultimate completion of sexual abuse"); Perez v. State, 313 P.3d 862, 868 (Nev. 2013) ("As a general matter, we hold that whether expert testimony on grooming behavior is admissible in a case involving sexual conduct ......
-
Farmer v. State
..."A witness may not vouch for the testimony of another or testify as to the truthfulness of another witness." Perez v. State, 129 Nev. 850, 861, 313 P.3d 862, 870 (2013). Upon review, we conclude that the challenged testimony does not constitute improper vouching so as to warrant relief.D. F......
-
Alfaro v. State
..."develop a bond between the victim and offender and, ultimately, make the victim more receptive to sexual activity." 129 Nev. 850, 853, 855, 313 P.3d 862, 864, 866 (2013). But Perez speaks to the admissibility of certain expert testimony on grooming. Id. at 859, 313 P.3d at 868. That issue ......
-
Price v. State
...testimony, compare NRS 50.265 with NRS 50.275, which is improper because Owens was not designated as an expert, Perez v. State, 129 Nev. 850, 863-64, 313 P.3d 862, 871 (2013) (setting forth factors for expert qualification). However, we find no vouching, as Owens failed to even mention Wall......
Get Started for Free
