Perez v. State Bd. of Parole
| Decision Date | 14 August 1990 |
| Parties | Osa J. PEREZ, Petitioner, v. STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent. CA A62615. |
| Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
Sally L. Avera, Acting Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
John A. Reuling, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole. By a previous order, the Board had established a parole release date for petitioner. He did not seek judicial review of that order but requested "administrative review of the decision by the Board." Its resulting order, from which he seeks judicial review, did not modify the original decision or in any way set a prison term; it only denied reconsideration. It is not a final order subject to review under ORS 144.335. We do not have jurisdiction.
Petition for judicial review dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wilcox v. Board of Parole
...argues that its March 2, 2004, order is not a "final order" within the meaning of ORS 144.335(1), as construed in Perez v. Board of Parole, 102 Or.App. 117, 792 P.2d 1246,rev. den., 310 Or. 243, 796 P.2d 360 (1990). Alternatively, relying in part on Frey v. Board of Parole, 152 Or.App. 462,......
-
Sager v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
...1987 order had passed. Because the 1991 order denying his request for a hearing does not modify the 1987 order, see Perez v. Board of Parole, 102 Or.App. 117, 792 P.2d 1246, rev. den. 310 Or. 243, 796 P.2d 360 (1990), he contends that his only avenue for relief is habeas However, the existe......
- Perez v. Board of Parole