Perkins v. Boston & A.R. Co.
Decision Date | 17 November 1898 |
Docket Number | 536. |
Citation | 90 F. 321 |
Parties | PERKINS v. BOSTON & A.R. CO. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
R. M Saltonstall, for plaintiff.
Woodward Hudson and Samuel Hoar, for defendant.
This was an action by Louis N. Perkins, administrator, a citizen of Connecticut, against the Boston & Albany Railroad Company to recover for the death of his intestate, who was an employe of defendant company, under Pub. St. Mass. c. 112, Sec. 212 Laws 1883, c. 243, which reads as follows:
The parties agree that this suit is based on the Public Statutes of Massachusetts (chapter 112, Sec. 212), as amended by the act of 188...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Boston & M. R. R. v. Hurd
... ... Railroad Co. (C.C.) 70 F. 409, held this statute ... strictly penal; and Judge Putnam, in Perkins v. Railroad ... Co. (C.C.) 90 F. 321, felt himself bound to follow Judge ... Carpenter, as no plain error appeared in his decision, and as ... the ... ...
-
Stevirmac Oil & Gas Co. v. Smith
...U.S. 657, 13 Sup.Ct. 224, 36 L.Ed. 1123; Wisconsin v. Pelican Insurance Co., 127 U.S. 265, 8 Sup.Ct. 1370, 32 L.Ed. 239; Perkins v. Boston & A.R. Co. (C.C.) 90 F. 321. Collins v. Kaw City Mill & Elevator Co., 26 Okl. 641, 110 P. 734, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma quotes with approval the fo......