Perkins v. Perkins, 74--1003

CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtDOWNEY; OWEN, C.J., and MAGER
CitationPerkins v. Perkins, 310 So.2d 438 (Fla. App. 1975)
Decision Date04 April 1975
Docket NumberNo. 74--1003,74--1003
PartiesMaurice A. PERKINS, Appellant, v. Edna B. PERKINS, Appellee.

William J. Neale, Melbourne, for appellant.

Hubert C. Normile, Jr., Nelson & Normile, P.A., Melbourne, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

The respondent husband appeals from those aspects of an amended final judgment of dissolution which, inter alia, (1) awarded the jointly owned marital domicile to the wife as partial lump sum alimony, (2) determined the wife was entitled to a special equity in the husband's business, (3) required the husband to maintain in effect certain life insurance and hospitalization insurance policies for the benefit of the wife and children.

We find adequate support in the record for the award of lump sum alimony. See cases cited at 10A, Fla.Jur., Dissolution of Marriage, etc., § 67. Similarily there is sufficient evidence to justify a finding that the wife has a special equity in the husband's business.

We deem the provision of the final judgment requiring the husband to 'maintain the life insurance policies presently in effect on the lives of the Respondent (husband), Petitioner (wife) and the children of the parties . . .' to be overly broad. The chancellor has no authority to require a husband to maintain life insurance for the benefit of the wife after final judgment. Peteler v. Peteler, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 291; Putman v. Putman, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 717; Faidley v. Faidley, Fla.App.1974, 298 So.2d 425; Wilbur v. Wilbur, Fla.App.1974, 299 So.2d 99. On the other hand, the court may require the husband to maintain life insurance for the benefit of his children. Bosem v. Bosem, Fla.1973, 279...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • Gregg v. Gregg
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 18, 1985
    ...insurance for the benefit of the wife were deemed attempts to impose post-mortem alimony and were held invalid. 6 See Perkins v. Perkins, 310 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Wilbur v. Wilbur, 299 So.2d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Faidley v. Faidley, 298 So.2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Putman. In th......
  • Eagan v. Eagan
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 21, 1981
    ...DCA 1979); Watterson v. Watterson, 353 So.2d 1185 (Fla.1st DCA 1977); Blass v. Blass, 316 So.2d 308 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Perkins v. Perkins, 310 So.2d 438 (Fla.4th DCA 1975); Wilbur v. Wilbur, 299 So.2d 99 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Faidley v. Faidley, 298 So.2d 425 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Bildner v. Bild......
  • Eberly v. Eberly
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 25, 1977
    ...Harloff v. Harloff, 279 So.2d 91 (Fla.2d DCA 1973); Bosem v. Bosem, 279 So.2d 863 (Fla.1973); Becker v. King, supra; Perkins v. Perkins, 310 So.2d 438 (Fla.4th DCA 1975); Moore v. Moore, 311 So.2d 152 (Fla.3d DCA 1975), cert. den., 324 So.2d 87 (Fla.1975). The earlier cases sustained such o......
  • Lynn Lou Webb v. Terry Lee Webb
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 1997
    ... ... child support matters. See, e.g., Perkins v. Perkins ... (Fla.App.) 310 So.2d 438 (finding that the court had no ... authority ... ...
  • Get Started for Free