Perlin v. King
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Citation | Perlin v. King, 36 A.D.3d 495, 828 N.Y.S.2d 53, 2007 NY Slip Op 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007) |
| Decision Date | 18 January 2007 |
| Docket Number | 9865. |
| Parties | DANIEL PERLIN et al., Respondents, v. MICHAEL KING, D.D.S. et al., Appellants. |
Credited expert testimony established that defendant pediatric dentist committed dental malpractice by failing to diagnose and treat infant plaintiff's congenital tooth and jawbone disorders, ankylosis and anodontia, and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Oakes v. Patel
...). I conclude, however, that the court's additur with respect to the noneconomic damages was excessive ( see generally Perlin v. King, 36 A.D.3d 495, 828 N.Y.S.2d 53; Rivera v. Lincoln Ctr. for Performing Arts, Inc., 16 A.D.3d 274, 792 N.Y.S.2d 39; Carlos v. W.H.P. 19, 301 A.D.2d 423, 752 N......
-
Oakes v. Patel
...arguments that an additur or remittitur granted by a trial court is either excessive or inadequate ( see e.g. Perlin v. King, 36 A.D.3d 495, 828 N.Y.S.2d 53 [1st Dept.2007]; Rivera v. Lincoln Ctr. for Performing Arts, Inc., 16 A.D.3d 274, 792 N.Y.S.2d 39 [1st Dept.2005]; Carlos v. W.H.P. 19......
- People ex rel. Moore v. Warden of Rikers Island Correctional Facility
-
Trager v. Endodontics
...to have departed from good and accepted dental practice (see Perez v Fitzgerald, 115 A.D.3d 177, 178 [1st Dept 2014]; Perlin v King, 36 A.D.3d 495, 495 [1st Dept 2007]; see generally Zabary v North Shore Hosp, Plainview, 190 A.D.3d 790, 795 [2d Dept 2021]; Lewis v Rutkovsky, 153 A.D.3d 450,......