Perlin v. King

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationPerlin v. King, 36 A.D.3d 495, 828 N.Y.S.2d 53, 2007 NY Slip Op 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Decision Date18 January 2007
Docket Number9865.
PartiesDANIEL PERLIN et al., Respondents, v. MICHAEL KING, D.D.S. et al., Appellants.

Credited expert testimony established that defendant pediatric dentist committed dental malpractice by failing to diagnose and treat infant plaintiff's congenital tooth and jawbone disorders, ankylosis and anodontia, and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Oakes v. Patel
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 19, 2011
    ...). I conclude, however, that the court's additur with respect to the noneconomic damages was excessive ( see generally Perlin v. King, 36 A.D.3d 495, 828 N.Y.S.2d 53; Rivera v. Lincoln Ctr. for Performing Arts, Inc., 16 A.D.3d 274, 792 N.Y.S.2d 39; Carlos v. W.H.P. 19, 301 A.D.2d 423, 752 N......
  • Oakes v. Patel
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 2, 2013
    ...arguments that an additur or remittitur granted by a trial court is either excessive or inadequate ( see e.g. Perlin v. King, 36 A.D.3d 495, 828 N.Y.S.2d 53 [1st Dept.2007]; Rivera v. Lincoln Ctr. for Performing Arts, Inc., 16 A.D.3d 274, 792 N.Y.S.2d 39 [1st Dept.2005]; Carlos v. W.H.P. 19......
  • People ex rel. Moore v. Warden of Rikers Island Correctional Facility
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 18, 2007
  • Trager v. Endodontics
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 27, 2024
    ...to have departed from good and accepted dental practice (see Perez v Fitzgerald, 115 A.D.3d 177, 178 [1st Dept 2014]; Perlin v King, 36 A.D.3d 495, 495 [1st Dept 2007]; see generally Zabary v North Shore Hosp, Plainview, 190 A.D.3d 790, 795 [2d Dept 2021]; Lewis v Rutkovsky, 153 A.D.3d 450,......