Perry, et al. v. Brown, et al.
| Docket Number | 10-16696,10-16577 |
| Decision Date | 07 February 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
76 cases
-
Duncan v. Becerra
...known as Proposition 63. Cf. Perry v. Schwarzenegger , 704 F.Supp.2d 921, 994–95 (N.D. Cal. 2010), aff'd sub nom. Perry v. Brown , 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012), and aff'd sub nom. Perry v. Brown , 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012) ("That the majority of California voters supported Proposition ......
-
Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids
...III standing in federal court." Miller v. Redwood Toxicology Lab., Inc., 688 F.3d 928, 934 (8th Cir.2012) (quoting Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052, 1074 (9th Cir.2012) (vacated and remanded on other grounds by Hollingsworth, 133 S.Ct. at 2668 )); see also Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472......
-
Kitchen v. Herbert
...reasoning, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Judge Walker's holding that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional. Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052, 1095 (9th Cir.2012). This issue was appealed to the Supreme Court, but the Court did not address the merits of the question presented. Hollin......
-
Obergefell v. Wymyslo
...at 985–90;Pedersen, 881 F.Supp.2d at 310–33;Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 704 F.Supp.2d 921, 997 (N.D.Cal.2010) aff'd sub nom Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir.2012) vacated and remanded sub nom Hollingsworth v. Perry, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2652, 186 L.Ed.2d 768 (2013); In re Balas, 449 ......
Get Started for Free
14 books & journal articles
-
Disability Constitutional Law
...8 unconstitutional and detailing the extent to which it was based on stereotypes about same-sex couples), aff'd sub now. Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012), vacated sub now. Hollingsworth v. Perry, 133 S. Ct. 2652 (2013).286. E.g., 159 Cong. Rec. H4168 (daily ed. June 28, 2013) (......
-
Marriage, Biology, and Federal Benefits
...for writ of certiorari in Hollingsworth v. Perry , a case challenging Proposition 8, California’s same-sex marriage ban. Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012), cert. granted sub nom. Hollingsworth v. Perry, 81 U.S.L.W. 3075 (U.S. Dec. 7, 2012) (No. 92-212). Although the discussion h......
-
Appendix 5: State Laws Relating to Marriage
...Ark. 222, 2014 WL 2021834 (2014) 5. Cal. Const. art. 1, § 7.5 (Proposition 8 adopted 2008), declared unconstitutional by Perry v. Schwarzenegger , 671 F.3d 1052 (9 th Cir. 2012), aff’g 704 F. Supp. 2d 921 (N.D. Cal. 2010), reh. en banc den . 681 F.3d 1065 (9 th Cir. 2012), cert. den., sub n......
-
Beyond DOMA: choice of state law in federal statutes.
...Wash. 2004). (52.) See, e.g., Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 704 F. Supp. 2d 921 (N.D. Cal. 2010), aff'd on narrower grounds, Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052, 1063 (9th Cir. (53.) Cf Akhil Reed Amar, Race, Religion, Gender, and Interstate Federalism. Some Notes from History, 16 QUINNIPIAC L. REV. 1......
Get Started for Free