Perry v. Board of Missions of Protestant Episcopal Church

Decision Date13 April 1886
CitationPerry v. Bd. of Missions of the P.E. Church, 102 N.Y. 99, 6 N.E. 116 (N.Y. 1886)
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesJOHN S. PERRY, Respondent, v. THE BOARD OF MISSIONS OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF ALBANY, Appellant.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from order of general term supreme court, Third department, affirming judgment for plaintiff on report of referee.

E. Countryman, for appellant.

Hamilton Harris, for respondent.

DANFORTH, J.

Upon trial before a referee, the plaintiff has been declared entitled to a lien in the nature of a mortgage upon certain premises on Elk street, in the city of Albany, for a balance due him for advances made for improvements and repairs thereon, and for interest on an existing mortgage amounting to the sum of $4,677.38, besides costs, and, in case the same be not paid within a certain time, that said real estate be sold in the same manner as sales are made upon mortgage foreclosure, and of the proceeds of such sale the plaintiff be paid the amount of said lien, with interest as aforesaid, together with his costs and disbursements. Upon appeal to the general term, the judgment upon this report was affirmed.

Some objections were made by the defendant to the admission of certain testimony, but it is not now contended that the facts found by the referee are not warranted by the evidence, or that they were not within the issues raised by the pleadings. The contention is against the referee's conclusion of law. It appears by his report that in September, 1869, the Right Reverend William Croswell Doane was bishop of Albany; and at that time, by the action of the convention of the Protestant Episcopal church in that diocese, a committee was appointed to take such steps as they might deem expedient for procuring a residence for the bishop; that in February, 1870, the vestry of St. Peter's church, in that city, appointed a committee, of which the plaintiff was chairman, to solicit subscriptions for the above purpose, and in that character he received moneys from various persons, in all to the amount of $12,825, and in June, 1870, under the advice of the bishop, and with the consent of the diocesan committee, he bought the premises above referred to at the price of $18,000, (of which $5,000 was in a then existing mortgage.) He paid the residue, and upon like consent caused the property to be conveyed, subject to the mortgage, to a corporation called ‘The Trustees of the Episcopal Fund of the Diocese of Albany;’ that thereupon ‘the plaintiff, at the request of the bishop, commenced making various improvements, alterations, and repairs in the dwelling upon the premises so purchased, all of which were necessary and proper to make it a suitable and convenient residence for him, and the plaintiff advancedthe moneys required to pay the bills for such improvements and repairs;’ that at ‘the annual meeting of the diocesan convention, in September, 1870, the diocesan committee made a report stating the manner in which the title was taken, described the property, and referred to the repairs and improvements. This report was on motion accepted;’ and at the same time the convention, with the consent of the trustees of the episcopal fund, directed them to transfer the title to said property to the defendant herein, ‘to be held and used for the support of the episcopate, and be a place of residence for the bishop of the diocese, and that the said board of missions be authorized and directed to make a bond and mortgage on the premises to secure the payment of the incumbrance thereon of $5,000, and also the payment of the sum advanced for the repairs and fitting up of the same for the episcopal residence;’ intending thereby to provide for and cover all the expenditures incurred by plaintiff for the improvements and repairs then in progress, and contemplated and included as well the sums thereafter advanced as those which had then been actually paid. The defendant is a corporation having power, among other things, to take and hold property, used, or intended to be used, for ‘diocesan institutions or purposes in the said diocese, and is subject to the directions and instructions which shall be given to it by the said convention. Laws 1870, c. 13. At this time the repairs and improvements were in progress, and only the sum of $173.92 had then been advanced by plaintiff in payment therefor. On the twentieth of October, 1870, in accordance with the above directions, the trustees of the episcopal fund of the diocese of Albany conveyed the premises to defendant, in trust, as a residence for the bishop of Albany, and on the same day, at a regular meeting of the board, passed the following resolution:

‘Resolved, that this board do, in accordance with the direction of the convention, hereby accept the conveyance of the said premises, to be held in trust for the uses and purposes above mentioned;...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
26 cases
  • Clark v. State St. Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • January 31, 1930
    ...v. Gardenier, 107 App. Div. 564, 95 N. Y. S. 494; affirmed in 184 N. Y. 612, 77 N. E. 1196;Perry v. Board of Missions of the Protestant Episcopal Church, 102 N. Y. 99, 6 N. E. 116;Muller v. Kling, 209 N. Y. 239, 244,103 N. E. 138;Jessup v. Smith, 223 N. Y. 203, 207,119 N. E. 403. See Klinzi......
  • The Rutherford National Bank v. H. R. Bogle & Company
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • November 27, 1933
    ...11 N. Y. 582; Payne v. Wilson, 74 N. Y. 348; Husted v. Ingraham, supra; Coman v. Lakey, 80 N. Y. 345; Perry v. Board of Missions P. E. Church, 102 N. Y. 99, 6 N. E. 116; Smith v. Smith, 125 N. Y. 224, 26 N. E. 259; Hoag v. Town of Greenwich, 133 N. Y. 152, 30 N. E. This now leaves for consi......
  • U.S. Fid. & Guaranty Co. v. Fid. Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • November 23, 1915
    ...Walker v. Brown, 165 U.S. 654, 17 S. Ct. 453, 41 L. Ed. 865, and note; Edwards v. Scruggs, 155 Ala. 568, 46 So. 850; Perry v. Board of Missions, 102 N.Y. 99, 6 N.E. 116; Hutzler Bros. v. Phillips, 26 S.C. 136, 1 S.E. 502, 4 Am. St. Rep. 687, and note; Richardson v. Hamlett, 33 Ark. 237; Mar......
  • Stramann v. Scheeren
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • October 14, 1895
    ...the money from the bank, and used it in the construction of the block." See, also, King's Heirs v. Thompson, 9 Pet. 204; Perry v. Board, 102 N.Y. 99, 6 N.E. 116; Finlayson Finlayson, 17 Or. 347, 21 P. 57; Garner v. Bank, 14 S.Ct. 390. "The courts allow the claims of wives against their husb......
  • Get Started for Free