Perry v. State

Decision Date20 May 1919
Docket Number8 Div. 644
Citation17 Ala.App. 80,81 So. 858
PartiesPERRY v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Limestone County; Robert C. Brickell Judge.

Jesse Perry was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Fred Wall, of Athens, for appellant.

J.Q Smith, Atty. Gen., and Horace Wilkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen for the State.

BRICKEN J.

The record in this cause presents rather an unusual state of affairs. First, it is shown that an affidavit was made before a justice of the peace charging this defendant with the offense of carrying a concealed pistol about his person. Without more, we next find a judgment of guilt in the county court of Limestone county. Next we find that the cause is tried in the circuit court of said county, upon what process it is not shown, and from a judgment of conviction in said court this appeal is taken. If the original warrant sworn out before the justice of the place was made returnable to the county court, this fact should have been shown by the record otherwise no jurisdiction of the case is shown to have been vested in the county court. And upon appeal from conviction in the county court to the circuit court the record should disclose that the necessary steps had been taken to perfect the appeal. Code, § 6725. Thereupon the trial in the circuit court should be de novo, and without indictment or presentment by the grand jury; "but the solicitor shall make a brief statement of the cause of complaint, signed by him," etc. (Code 1907, § 6730), and, unless this statement is waived, it is error to place the defendant upon trial in the circuit court in cases appealed from a judgment of conviction in the county court. Moss v. State, 42 Ala. 546; Haynes v. State, 5 Ala.App. 167, 59 So. 325; James M. Howard v. State, 81 So. 345.

In the instant case no such statement of the cause of complaint was signed by the solicitor, nor filed in the cause, nor is such statement shown to have been waived; therefore, under the authorities of the cases supra, the judgment of conviction must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

We are not prepared to hold that the court erred in overruling the motion of defendant to exclude the evidence. The appellant simply moved the court to exclude the evidence without assigning any grounds therefor. The proper practice in such cases is to assign as grounds the failure of the evidence to establish a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Garner v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • July 19, 1949
    ... ... denying appellant's motion to exclude the evidence and ... discharge appellant was properly denied. Furthermore, no ... grounds were assigned in support of the motion, and under ... such circumstances a lower court should not be put in error ... for its ruling. Perry v. State, 17 Ala.App. 80, 81 ...          The ... defense presented only one witness in the trial below Mr. B ... O. Hudson. The material portion of his testimony was to the ... effect that a tractor of the type driven by appellant is 8 ... feet in width ...          Among ... ...
  • Owens v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • February 12, 1924
    ... ... complaint by the solicitor constitutes reversible error ... Moss v. State, 42 Ala. 546; Haynes v. State, 5 ... Ala. App. 167, 59 So. 325; Kirkham v. State, 18 ... Ala. App. 426, 93 So. 56; Peeples v. State, 17 Ala ... App. 430, 84 So. 859; Perry v. State, 17 Ala. App ... 80, 81 So. 858; Howard v. State, 17 Ala. App. 9, 81 ... So. 345; Collins v. State (Ala. App.) 98 So. 488 ... It ... appears from the record here that the defendant was put to ... trial in the circuit court upon the original affidavit or ... complaint in ... ...
  • Latikos v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • February 1, 1921
    ... ... which this appeal is taken, acquired jurisdiction of this ... cause. It is necessary that this should affirmatively appear ... by the record. Moss v. State, 42 Ala. 546; ... Haynes v. State, 5 Ala.App. 167, 59 So. 325; ... Howard v. State, 81 So. 345; Perry v ... State, 81 So. 858; Peeples v. State, 84 So ... On the ... trial of this defendant in the circuit court it appears that ... the state relied principally upon the testimony of the ... witness Clarence Leland, who testified, among other things, ... that he had been in the employ ... ...
  • Jacobs v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • April 6, 1920
    ... ... finally tried in the inferior criminal court, and judgment of ... conviction rendered against the defendant, and from such ... judgment an appeal was taken, these facts necessarily must ... affirmatively appear from the record. Haynes v ... State, 5 Ala.App. 167, 59 So. 325; Perry v ... State, 81 So. 858. If an appeal is taken to the circuit ... court, the cause must there be tried upon a brief statement ... of complaint, signed by the solicitor, as provided by Code ... 1907, § 6732, unless such complaint is shown to have been ... waived by and with the consent of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT