Perry v. State

• Decision Date: 17 September 2001
• Docket Number: No. S01A1150.,S01A1150.
• Citation: Perry v. State, 552 S.E.2d 798, 274 Ga. 236 (Ga. 2001)
• Parties: PERRY v. The STATE.
• Court: Georgia Supreme Court

552 S.E.2d 798

274 Ga. 236

PERRY v.The STATE.

No. S01A1150.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

September 17, 2001.

John R. Mobley, II, Alfred F. Zachry, LaGrange, for appellant.

J. Gray Conger, Dist. Atty., George E. Lipscomb, II, Asst. Dist. Atty., Columbus, Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Tammy J. Philbrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.HINES, Justice.

A jury found Brandon Perry guilty of malice murder, felony murder while in the commission of armed robbery, armed robbery, aggravated assault, two counts of possession of a firearm/knife during the commission of a felony, and theft by taking a motor vehicle in connection with the fatal shooting of Latisha McDaniel and the wounding of Paul Morrison.Perry challenges the admission into evidence of his custodial statement; the sufficiency of the evidence of armed robbery; and the allowance of a physical demonstration of the position of the murder victim when she was shot and killed.Finding the challenges to be without merit, we affirm.¹

The evidence construed in favor of the verdicts showed that shortly after midnight on the morning of December 14, 1995, Brandon Perry, nicknamed "B-Nut," went alone to the mobile home where Paul Morrison lived to purchase marijuana.Morrison's girlfriend, Latisha McDaniel, and McDaniel's four-year-old daughter, Tess, also lived there and were present at the time.Morrison left Perry in the living room while he went back to the bedroom, where he and McDaniel had been watching a video, to retrieve a "joint" of marijuana to sell Perry.When he returned, Perry was standing in the kitchen holding two automatic pistols, one black and one chrome.Perry then fired, and a bullet struck Morrison in the face.

Morrison fell next to the kitchen table.As he was lying there, he could hear a lot of noise like "stuff getting shoved around" followed by a gunshot.He continued to hear noises and then saw Perry emerge from the bedroom.He lay still as Perry walked into the kitchen and behind him.Perry went through Morrison's pockets and stabbed him in the back and side with a butcher knife.Perry went back down the hall and took Morrison's pit bull puppy from a cardboard box.Perry then left and drove away in McDaniel's car.

Morrison managed to get up and exit the mobile home to get help.As he walked out, he saw McDaniel on the floor of the bedroom but did not know that she was dead.He went to a nearby mobile home, where a neighbor called the police.Having removed the knife from his back, Morrison lay down until the police arrived.He was able to tell them that "B-Nut" shot him and to give them the make and license plate number of the stolen car before being taken to the hospital.

The police found Tess in the mobile home, terrified but physically unharmed.McDaniel's body was in the bedroom.She was on her knees with her face toward the ground in what was described as a "fetal position" or "Indian style."She had sustained a bullet wound through the head; the pistol had been placed directly against her temple, and the bullet traveled from the front of her head towards the back at a downward angle.McDaniel's purse was found in the bedroom; the contents had been dumped onto the bed.

Approximately an hour later, Perry showed up at his cousin's home with Morrison's pit bull puppy.The cousin later received information that Perry had hidden a chrome automatic pistol in her home.She allowed the police to retrieve the weapon.In the past, the cousin had seen Perry with a black automatic handgun.Approximately six hours after the crimes Perry was stopped by a patrol unit while driving the stolen car.In a videotaped statement, Perry admitted that he was present at Morrison's mobile home during the shootings but claimed that a companion named "J.D." shot the victims.Perry subsequently admitted that he lied about a perpetrator "J.D." in his statements to police.

1.Perry is unsuccessful in his contention that the trial court erred in permitting evidence of his videotaped custodial statement because it was coerced by promises of benefit made to him.At the Jackson-Denno hearing, Perry asserted that a detective, who was an acquaintance since childhood, spoke with him before Perry was taken into the interview room, and told Perry that if he admitted to the killing, the detective "would see that [Perry did] nine years and get out."But the detective did not testify at the hearing, and the State presented evidence that two other officers were involved in Perry's detention and questioning, and that Perry was not promised anything in return for his statement.The trial court makes findings about facts and credibility relating to the admissibility of an inculpatory statement, thereby resolving any conflicts in the evidence, and those determinations are to be upheld on appeal unless clearly erroneous.Berry v. State,267 Ga. 605, 610(7), 481 S.E.2d 203(1997).And the record in this case supports the trial court's finding of voluntariness.

What is more, even accepting Perry's alleged exchange with the detective, the evidence does not support the finding that Perry's recorded statement was induced by the hope of benefit so as to render it inadmissible.OCGA § 24-3-50.At the J...