Peterman v. Darby
Decision Date | 20 October 1967 |
Citation | 419 S.W.2d 747 |
Parties | William H. PETERMAN, Administrator of the Estate of David Timothy Peterman, Deceased, Appellant, v. Ivan DARBY et al., Appellees. |
Court | Supreme Court of Kentucky |
Thomas Burchett, Sr., Burchett & Burchett, Ashland, for appellant.
Charles M. Daniels, Greenup, Jack R. Kibbey, Vanceburg, A. W. Mann, Ashland, for appellee.
David T. Peterman, 17 years of age, was killed in an automobile collision on July 8, 1963. He was a passenger in a pick-up truck driven by his friend, William I. Darby, and owned by William's father, Ivan Darby. The truck collided with an automobile operated by Charles W. Reffett. William H. Peterman, administrator of the estate of David T. Peterman, brought a wrongful death action against Ivan Darby, William I. Darby and Charles W. Reffett. The court sustained motions for a directed verdict and stated 'that the plaintiff has failed in his duty to establish that either Charles W. Reffett or William I. Darby acted negligently in any way, * * *'. Judgment was entered dismissing the suit as to all defendants. Peterman, administrator, appealed. We reverse.
The pleadings admitted the appointment and qualification of Peterman as administrator; that Ivan Darby was the father of William I. Darby; William's age at the time of the accident; that the 1954 Chevrolet pick-up truck which William was driving when the accident occurred was used with the consent, permission and acquiescence of Ivan Darby with whom William resided and that it was a vehicle used for the convenience and pleasure of the family. The Darbys cross-claimed against Reffett. They demanded indemnity, contribution and $500.00 for damage to their truck.
The Low Gap Road is hard surfaced and generally runs in an east west direction. Walker Lane is a dirt road which forms a T intersection with Low Gap Road. Proceeding westwardly on Low Gap Road one encounters a slight turn to the right immediately before reaching the intersection of Walker Lane, and shortly thereafter the road makes a slight turn to the left. At the time of the collision the shoulders of Low Gap Road were grown up in high weeds and bushes. Photographs introduced clearly showed that this road is of sufficient width for two vehicles proceeding in opposite directions to pass each other without difficulty.
The administrator testified that David T. Peterman was a senior high school student and was in good health. He said that he measured the blacktop portion of Low Gap Road at the place of the accident and that it was 14 feet in width. Later he said 'it was 14 or 16 feet wide at that time.' He also testified that William I. Darby
Patricia Reffett was called as a witness for plaintiff. She testified that she was the wife of Charles W. Reffett; that he was driving the car; that she was riding as a passenger in the front seat of the Oldsmobile as it traveled along Walker Lane and approached Low Gap Road. She said that when they reached the intersection they came to a stop but because of the weeds and trees they could not see even though they had looked both ways. They moved 'just barely on' to the highway and came to a second stop. She said that By that time she first saw the Darby truck coming from their left and it was 'almost on us and he was coming fast.' She said that they were in the process of making a left turn onto the highway and that their car was 'pointed to the left to some degree.' The right front of the Darby truck collided with the right front of the Reffett automobile.
The next witness for plaintiff was Estill Coleman, a Kentucky State Police Officer, who arrived about 30 minutes after the accident occurred. He testified as to the positions of the vehicles when he arrived. He made excellent photographs of the highway and the vehicles. They show extensive damage to the right front of the Oldsmobile and the right front and right side of the Darby truck. These photographs were introduced in evidence and are of substantial aid in understanding the testimony of the various witnesses.
The plaintiff then presented Wanda McCoy, a daughter of Peterman, the administrator. She testified that on a number of occasions William I. Darby told her She was asked and answered:
'Q. 7 Did he tell you what he was doing just before it happened?
A. He was talking about looking at the speedometer. They had been judging how far they had come to that time.'
The parties stipulated that David T. Peterman died as a result of the injuries he sustained in the accident. The plaintiff then rested whereupon the respective counsel for all defendants moved for the directed verdict contending that plaintiff had 'proved no substantive negligence on the part of anybody.' CR 50.01. The court sustained the motion for the peremptory instruction. Counsel for plaintiff objected strenuously and later moved for a new trial.
The appeal as to Reffett has been dismissed. We...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Spradlin v. E. Coast Miner, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC)
- Spradlin v. E. Coast Miner, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC)
-
Briner v. General Motors Corp.
...or surmise. Wright v. Hickman, 308 Ky. 634, 215 S.W.2d 553 (1948); Randall v. Shelton, Ky., 293 S.W.2d 559 (1956); Peterman v. Darby, Ky., 419 S.W.2d 747 (1967). It is, of course, often difficult to draw the line between a reasonable inference and speculation. But evidence that will support......
-
Lovins v. Napier
...that is entirely at variance with physical laws, or where physical facts are such as to make that evidence unbelievable. Peterman v. Darby, Ky., 419 S.W.2d 747 (1967). There appears to be no evidence of substance that the truck driver breached any duties to the Lovins which reasonable minds......