Peters v. City of White Plains
| Decision Date | 27 January 2009 |
| Docket Number | 2007-10687. |
| Citation | Peters v. City of White Plains, 58 A.D.3d 824, 872 N.Y.S.2d 502, 2009 NY Slip Op 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009) |
| Parties | ERIC PETERS, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF WHITE PLAINS et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff Eric Peters alleged that he slipped and fell on a ramp in a public parking garage leased and maintained by the City of White Plains. He alleged that the surface of the ramp was wet, uneven, and pitted. The defendants City of White Plains and White Plains Parking Authority (hereinafter the defendants) moved for summary judgment alleging that there was no prior written notice of the defect as required by Municipal Code of the City of White Plains § 277.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Municipal Code requirement that there be prior written notice of a defect in a parking garage in order to maintain an action against the City complies with General Municipal Law § 50-e (4) (see Walker v Town of Hempstead, 84 NY2d 360 [1994]). A public parking garage, like a parking lot, falls within the definition of a highway and is one of the areas in which the General Municipal Law permits a local government to require notice of defective conditions (see Walker v Town of Hempstead, 84 NY2d at 366, 367; Mendes v Whitney-Floral Realty Corp....
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Groninger v. Vill. of Mamaroneck
...falls within the definition of a “highway” and therefore prior notice of defect is required ( see e.g. Peters v. City of White Plains, 58 A.D.3d 824, 825, 872 N.Y.S.2d 502 [2d Dept.2009]; Walker v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 52 A.D.3d 697, 697, 860 N.Y.S.2d 188 [2d Dept.2008]; Healy v. ......
-
Congero v. City of Glen Cove
...garage in order to maintain an action against the [defendant] complies with General Municipal Law § 50–e(4)" ( Peters v. City of White Plains, 58 A.D.3d 824, 825, 872 N.Y.S.2d 502 ; see Walker v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 52 A.D.3d 697, 860 N.Y.S.2d 188 ), and it applies to the icy con......
-
Pesantes v. Komatsu Forklift Usa, Inc.
... ... to defeat a motion for summary judgment (see Jaffe v New York City Tr. Auth., 52 AD3d 784 [2008]; Skouras v New York City Tr. Auth., 48 AD3d ... ...