Peters v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York, 3352.

Decision Date13 November 1933
Docket NumberNo. 3352.,3352.
Citation4 F. Supp. 928
PartiesPETERS v. MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania

Forest J. Mervine, of Stroudsburg, Pa., for plaintiff.

O'Malley, Hill, Harris & Harris, of Scranton, Pa., for defendant.

JOHNSON, District Judge.

The question of law to be decided is raised on an affidavit of defense raising questions of law to plaintiff's statement of claim. The plaintiff brought his action of assumpsit to recover the sum of $304.20, a premium paid on October 18, 1930, on an insurance policy, No. 4069323, issued to the plaintiff on his life, October 18, 1928, and also to recover $100 per month from July 3, 1930, down to the time of trial, with interest; also the sum of $408.90, a premium paid on October 18, 1930, on an insurance policy, No. 4069324, issued to the plaintiff on his life October 18, 1928.

The plaintiff contends that on July 3, 1930, while at the age of thirty-four years, he became totally and permanently disabled by disease causing an impairment of his body so that since that date he has been continuously prevented thereby from following a gainful occupation and that by section 3 of policy No. 4069323, which provides, "If, before attaining the age of sixty years and while no premium on this policy is in default, the Insured shall furnish to the Company due proof that he is totally and permanently disabled, as defined above, the company will grant the following benefits during the remaining lifetime of the insured so long as such disability continues. * * * The company will pay a monthly income to the Insured of the amount stated on the first page hereof ($10. per $1,000 face amount of Policy), beginning upon receipt of due proof of such disability, etc. * * * The Company will also, after receipt of such due proof, waive payment of each premium as it thereafter becomes due during such disability." The plaintiff is entitled to recover $100 per month from October 18, 1930, to the time of trial, and the premium of $304.20, which he paid October 18, 1930, after he became totally and permanently disabled by disease on July 3, 1930. The plaintiff contends that by the provisions of section 3 of policy No. 4069324, which provides, "If, before attaining the age of sixty years and while no premium on this policy is in default, the Insured shall furnish to the company due proof that he is totally and permanently disabled, as defined above, the company will waive payment of each premium as it thereafter...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Smith
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • January 22, 1935
    ...N.Y., 143 Misc. 587, 257 N.Y.S. 772, 773; Berry v. Lamar Life Ins. Co., 165 Miss. 405, 142 So. 445, 145 So. 887; Peters v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York (D.C.) 4 F. Supp. 928; Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co., 284 U.S. 489, 52 S. Ct. 230, 231, 76 L. Ed. In the Epstein Case, the complaint......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT