Petersen v. Petersen
| Decision Date | 17 December 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-973,79-973 |
| Citation | 392 So.2d 298 |
| Parties | Linda PETERSEN, now known as Linda Cowan, Appellant, v. Henrik PETERSEN, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Andrew A. Graham, Cocoa, for appellant.
Vincent A. Lloyd of Lloyd & Brown, Fort Pierce, for appellee.
Linda Cowan, the mother of Gregory and Stephanie Petersen, appeals the denial of her petition for modification wherein, due to the adverse impact of inflation, she requested an increase of child support from $30 to $60 per week. We reverse and remand.
Linda (now Cowan) and Henrik Petersen were married in 1964. They had two children, Gregory and Stephanie. Their marriage ended in divorce in 1969 and the final judgment of dissolution awarded primary custody of the children to the mother and required the father to pay the total sum of $30 per week as child support.
In 1978, nine years after the divorce, Mrs. Cowan filed a petition for modification of the final judgment of dissolution. She averred, in part, that she was "unable to properly provide for the children's welfare on $30 per week and Respondent is well able to afford to pay increased child support." Testimony at the hearing indicated that Mrs. Cowan had remarried but remained unemployed. She testified that Gregory and Stephanie, who were 4 and 2 at the time of the divorce, are now 14 and 12 and that $30 per week was simply insufficient to provide for their support. Mr. Petersen, in turn, admitted that he could afford a $20 per week increase and testified that his weekly salary had risen from approximately $235 in 1969 to $325 in 1979. Next, Mrs. Cowan's attorney introduced into evidence, without objection, a chart prepared by the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics which indicated that the purchasing power of the dollar had decreased substantially since 1969.
Considering Mr. Petersen's salary increase, the court reasoned "(t)hat inflation has affected Respondent's salary to the extent that his current salary is approximately the same as the former salary as far as buying power is concerned." Therefore, the court denied the request for an increase in child support, finding that "there has been no change in circumstance upon which a modification of child support could be based." We respectfully disagree.
The court's reasoning is flawed in that it fails to consider the adverse impact of inflation on both parties. Though Mr. Petersen's purchasing power-despite salary increases-remains at the 1969 level, Mrs. Cowan's purchasing power has decreased substantially below the 1969 level. It is erroneous to consider one without the other; seen together, they establish a substantial change in one of the parties' circumstances. Moreover, in a proceeding for modification of child support, a court should consider evidence as to the increased needs of the children as well as the father's increased ability to pay. Diaco v. Diaco, 363 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). In the case at bar, there is substantial competent evidence of (1) the adverse impact of inflation; (2) increased needs of the children caused by their reaching adolescence; and (3) Mr. Petersen's increased...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brown v. Brown, 84-916
...(Fla.1980); DeCenzo v. DeCenzo, 433 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Wolfe v. Wolfe, 424 So.2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Petersen v. Petersen, 392 So.2d 298 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Johnson v. Johnson, 386 So.2d 14 (Fla. 5th DCA), petition for review denied, 392 So.2d 1375 (Fla.1980); Schottenstein......
-
Wolfe v. Wolfe
...of the evidence presented concerning the increased needs of her children, now adolescents, and inflation. Citing to Petersen v. Petersen, 392 So.2d 298 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), she claims error was committed, especially in light of the fact that the effect of the trial court's order is to award......
-
Flynn v. Flynn, 82-1179
...children is an important factor to be considered in connection with an application for increase in child support. Petersen v. Petersen, 392 So.2d 298 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). On the other hand a change in the circumstances of the parties without reference to the increased needs of the children ......
-
Cohen v. Cohen
...from the time of the original award in New Jersey and the date of the hearing in the Florida trial court. See Petersen v. Petersen, 392 So.2d 298 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The other issues raised by the ex-husband are the reopening of the hearing by the trial court to consider the issue of attor......