Peterson v. United States
Decision Date | 03 February 1919 |
Docket Number | 3185. |
Citation | 255 F. 433 |
Parties | PETERSON v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
A. P Black, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.
Annette Abbott Adams, U.S. Atty., John W. Preston, Sp. Asst. Atty Gen., and James E. Colston, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., all of San Francisco, Cal.
Before GILBERT, ROSS, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.
It is the settled rule in this circuit that where the officers of the law have incited a person to commit the crime charged and lured him on to its consummation with the purpose of arresting him in its commission, the law will not authorize a verdict of guilty. Taylor v. United States, 193 F 968, 113 C.C.A. 543; Woo Wai v. United States, 223 F. 412, 137 C.C.A. 604; Sam Yick et al. v. United States, 240 F. 60, 153 C.C.A. 96. The distinction between such a case and the well-recognized rule authorizing the use of decoy letters to detect a crime already committed was clearly pointed out by this court in the case of Holsman v. United States, 248 F. 193, 199, 200, 160 C.C.A. 271.
In the present case the plaintiff in error was charged by indictment with selling intoxicating liquor, namely, three bottles of beer, to a soldier named George Garis, who was a corporal, while in uniform, on the night of August 11, 1917. The case as made by the evidence showed, among other things, that the defendant owned a three-story house on the corner of Devisadero and Lombard streets, San Francisco, known as the Fairview Hotel, the lower floor of which was used as an ice cream parlor, in which were also sold tobacco, cigars, candy, soft drinks, and like articles. The two upper floors contained 20 rooms, 4 or 5 of which were used by her family, and the remainder rented to roomers and boarders as occasion offered.
There was certainly ample evidence given tending to show that the plaintiff in error willfully violated the law in selling to the soldier the intoxicating liquor, and that, complaints having been received by the officers of the law from different sources that she was engaged in such unlawful traffic, Garis and another soldier, as well as a police officer named Hand, all dressed in United States uniform, were sent to her place to investigate, and that during such investigation the defendant did in fact sell to Garis, for money, three bottles of beer; but the defendant testified in her own behalf, among other things, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sorrells v. United States
...A. 8th) 273 F. 35, 18 A. L. R. 143-note; Robinson v. United States (C. C. A. 8th) 32 F.(2d) 505, 66 A. L. R. 468-note; Peterson v. United States (C. C. A. 9th) 255 F. 433. See Cornelius on Search and Seizure, § 75 et 2 Grimm v. United States, 156 U. S. 604, 15 S. Ct. 470, 39 L. Ed. 550; Goo......
-
Sorrells v. United States
...v. Adams (D.C.) 59 F. 674; Sam Yick v. United States (C.C.A.) 240 F. 60, 65; United States v. Echols (D.C.) 253 F. 862; Peterson v. United States (C.C.A.) 255 F. 433; Billingsley v. United States (C.C.A.) 274 F. 86, 89; Luterman v. United States (C.C.A.) 281 F. 374, 377; United States v. Pa......
-
O'BRIEN v. United States
...S., 4 F.(2d) 99 (C. C. A. Ohio); Di Salvo v. U. S., 2 F.(2d) 222 (C. C. A. 8); Silk v. U. S., 16 F.(2d) 568 (C. C. A. 8); Peterson v. U. S., 255 F. 433 (C. C. A. Cal.); Butts v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 273 F. 35, 18 A. L. R. 143; State v. Decker (Mo. Sup.) 33 S.W.(2d) 958; State v. McKeehan, 48 Id......
-
State v. Kirkbride
...Phelan for appellant. The court erred in refusing instructions on an enticement or entrapment; Duff vs. State (Ariz.) 171 P. 133; Peterson vs. U. S. 255 F. 433; 8 R. C. L. 1. Zoline's F. C. L. & P. 290; U. S. vs. Jones, 80 F. 513; Yick vs. U. S. 240 F. 60; U. S. vs. Echols, 253 F. 862; U. S......