Peterson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Peterson)
Decision Date | 19 April 2018 |
Docket Number | Adv. Pro. No. 17–2081 (AMN),Case No.: 10–23429 (AMN) |
Citation | 585 B.R. 1 |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Connecticut |
Parties | IN RE: Alyssa S. PETERSON, Debtor Alyssa S. Peterson, Plaintiff v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Molly T. Whiton, Former Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Defendants |
Alyssa S. Peterson, 297 Grandview Terrace, Hartford, CT 06114, Pro Se Plaintiff
Christin E. Sheehan, Esq., Morrison Mahoney, LLP, One Consitution Plaza, 10th Floor, Hartford, CT 06103, Counsel for the Defendant, Molly T. Whiton, Former Chapter 13 Standing Trustee
Re: ECF Nos. 6, 13
Before the court is a motion filed by the defendant Molly T. Whiton as the former Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (the "Former Trustee") seeking dismissal of counts five through nine1 of the adversary proceeding complaint2 ("AP Complaint") filed by the debtor-plaintiff, Alyssa S. Peterson ("Ms. Peterson") pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), made applicable to this adversary proceeding by Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7012(b). AP–ECF No. 13.3 In the alternative, the Former Trustee seeks summary judgment as to counts five though nine based upon the doctrine of general release. AP–ECF No. 13. For the reasons that follow, the court grants the Former Trustee's motion to dismiss counts five through nine. As the court's order granting dismissal is dispositive, the court need not reach the Former Trustee's motion for summary judgment and that request is moot.
This court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b) and 157(b), and the District Court's Order of referral of bankruptcy matters, dated September 21, 1984. This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A). This adversary proceeding arises under Ms. Peterson's Chapter 13 case pending in this District; therefore, venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409.
On October 5, 2010, Ms. Peterson, proceeding pro se , filed a voluntary Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition (the "Petition Date").4 ECF No. 1. From the Petition Date through August 31, 2017, Ms. Peterson's Chapter 13 bankruptcy was assigned to the Former Trustee. Approximately two and a half years after the Petition Date, on March 7, 2013, Ms. Peterson filed her Fifth Amended Chapter 13 Plan ("5th Amended Plan"). ECF No. 245.
A brief background regarding a pre-bankruptcy judgment obtained against a third party, Hannah Woldeyohannes ("Ms. Woldeyohannes") is important to understand Ms. Peterson's 5th Amended Plan and this AP Complaint. Throughout the AP Complaint, Ms. Peterson references a judgment obtained against Ms. Woldeyohannes and acknowledges her status as a judgment creditor of Ms. Woldeyohannes. See AP Complaint, AP–ECF No. 6, ¶ 12 (), ¶ 34 (), and ¶ 35. Accordingly, this court takes judicial notice of the documents filed in Ms. Woldeyohannes's Chapter 7 bankruptcy case ("Woldeyohannes Case"), case number 11–20003 and in Ms. Peterson's Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, case number 10–23429.5 In January of 2011, Ms. Woldeyohannes filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition. ECF No. 1 in case number 11–20003. In the Woldeyohannes Case, Ms. Peterson filed a proof of claim asserting a debt owed by Ms. Woldeyohannes of $248,117.52. POC 2–1 in case number 11–20003. As a basis for her claim, Ms. Peterson attached a copy of a judgment dated November 13, 2009 obtained against Ms. Woldeyohannes ("Woldeyohannes Judgment") in an action pending before the Connecticut Superior Court entitled Alyssa Peterson v. Hannah Woldeyohannes and bearing docket number HHD–CV–04–0834966–S. POC 2–1, P. 6 of 21. The Woldeyohannes Judgment awarded Ms. Peterson damages of $118,500.00. POC 2–1, P. 20 of 21. The Woldeyohannes Judgment was later amended to include an award of interest, bringing the total award to $195,482.96 as of November 13, 2009. POC 2–1, P. 5 of 21; See also Ms. Peterson' Schedule A, ECF No. 18 in case number 10–23429. The Woldeyohannes Judgment also determined that Ms. Woldeyohannes was the sole owner of a limited liability company named A to Zee, LLC, and prohibited Ms. Woldeyohannes from assigning her interest in A to Zee, LLC, and/or encumbering the assets owned by A to Zee, LLC. POC 2–1, P. 6 of 21.
In May of 2012, the court (Dabrowski, J.), in the Woldeyohannes Case, granted Ms. Peterson's motion seeking relief from the automatic stay to pursue collection of the Woldeyohannes Judgment.6 ECF Nos. 56 and 61 in case number 11–20003. Thereafter, in December of 2012, Ms. Peterson filed an amended motion for relief seeking permission to pursue collection of the Woldeyohannes Judgment against the assets of A to Zee, LLC. ECF No. 85 in case number 11–20003. In her amended motion, Ms. Peterson noted that subsequent to the entry of the Woldeyohannes Judgment, she commenced an action entitled Alyssa Peterson v. Carlton Hume, Hume & Associates, LLC, J. Hanson Guest, Guest & Associates, LLC, A to Zee, LLC, Mussie Russom, Sofia Woldeyohannes, Yodit Woldeyohannes, and Isaias Woldeyohannes , bearing docket number HHD–CV–11–5035394–S. See ECF No. 85 in case number 11–20003. As part of this subsequent action, Ms. Peterson obtained an order of prejudgment remedy entitling Ms. Peterson to attach the value of One Hundred Fifty–Two Thousand ($152,000.00) Dollars to the real estate owned by A to Zee, LLC. ECF No. 85 in case number 11–20003. The court (Dabrowski, J.) granted Ms. Peterson's amended motion, conditioned as follows:
This Order was also docketed in Ms. Peterson's main bankruptcy case as ECF No. 215, and is referenced in the AP Complaint as a basis for Ms. Peterson's assertion that the Former Trustee owed a duty to Ms. Peterson.
In her Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, Ms. Peterson proposed to fund her 5th Amended Plan primarily through proceeds of settlements or the collection of judgments against various third parties. In particular, the 5th Amended Plan contained the following funding-related provisions:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fetman v. Musso
...Corp. v. Nisselson (In re Ctr. Teleprods., Inc.), 112 B.R. 567, 578 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1990))); Peterson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Peterson), 585 B.R. 1, 14 n.10 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2018) ("[T]o the extent that the [f]ormer [t]rustee's conduct stems from her business judgment in performin......
-
In re Peterson
...generally In rePeterson, No. 10-23429 (AMN), 2019 WL 364261 (Bankr. D. Conn. Jan. 28, 2019); Peterson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 17-2081 (AMN), 585 B.R. 1 (Bankr. D. Conn. Apr. 19, 2018). In brief, the Appellant was a debtor in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. The Bankruptcy Court approved......