PETITION FOR NATURALIZATION OF FELLESON, Petition No. 730-P-384339.
Decision Date | 30 December 1958 |
Docket Number | Petition No. 730-P-384339. |
Citation | 169 F. Supp. 471 |
Parties | Petition for Naturalization of Egon Ingvar FELLESON. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
Donald C. Lundquist, Zion, Ill., for petitioner.
Anthony D. Petrone, Jr., Designated Naturalization Examiner, Chicago, Ill., Irving I. Freedman, Asst. Dist. Director for Citizenship, Chicago Dist., Chicago, Ill., Charles Gordon, Regional Counsel, Northwest Region, St. Paul, Minn., for Immigration & Naturalization Service.
The petitioner, Egon Ingvar Felleson, seeks citizenship under the general provisions of the naturalization law. No objection looms except the possible roadblock erected by a claim of exemption from military service made May 8, 1951, during our involvement in the Korean conflict. Felleson has asserted that he was advised at that time that the filing of this application was the only way he could obtain permission to visit his dying mother in Sweden. After his mother's death he evinced willingness to serve and someone, not identified in the record, has written "Cancelled" across his exemption application.
On April 1, 1952 Felleson was inducted into the United States Armed Forces and served almost two years, including combat action in Korea. Among his military decorations were the Korean Service Ribbon with two Bronze Service Stars, the National Defense Service Medal, and the United Nations Service Medal. On March 9, 1954 he was honorably discharged.
While in the Army overseas Felleson mailed an application for naturalization to the Central Office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service in Washington, D. C. This application relied on Public Law 86, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess., 8 U.S.C.A. § 1440a et seq., which awarded enlarged naturalization rights to aliens who rendered honorable military service during the Korean episode. However, on February 24, 1954 the Service advised him that he had forfeited naturalization privileges because of his application for draft exemption, and that the subsequent military activity had not expunged the stigma. This administrative view of the Service later was altered. However, the special benefits of Public Law 86 expired December 31, 1955 and are no longer available.1
The Service has recommended that the petition for naturalization be granted. The underlying questions manifestly have wide impact.
Section 315 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1426, provides:
Section 101(a) (19) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101(a) (19), contains the following definition:
"The term `ineligible to citizenship,' when used in reference to any individual, means, notwithstanding the provisions of any treaty relating to military service, an individual who is, or was at any time, permanently debarred from becoming a citizen of the United States under section 3(a) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended (54 Stat. 885; 55 Stat. 844), or under section 4(a) of the Selective Service Act of 1948, as amended (62 Stat. 605; 65 Stat. 76), or under any section of this Act, or any other Act, or under any law amendatory of, supplementary to, or in substitution for, any of such sections or Acts."
Since World War I the various selective service laws have allowed certain classes of aliens to apply for relief from conscription but have specified in each instance that the applicant thereafter would be debarred from becoming a citizen of the United States.2 While these edicts originally were not inscribed in the naturalization statute, they unquestionably generated the loss of citizenship benefits. See Ceballos v. Shaughnessy, 1957, 352 U.S. 599, 77 S.Ct. 545, 1 L.Ed. 2d 583.
The inhibitions of the selective service laws were woven into the fabric of the naturalization statute itself by Sec. 315 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, quoted at an earlier point. That enactment decreed permanent ineligibility to citizenship of an alien who "applies or has applied" for relief from military service "and is or was relieved or discharged from such training or service." A similar, but not identical, declaration is found in the definition of ineligibility to citizenship announced in Sec. 101(a) (19) of the 1952 Act, also reproduced at an earlier point. The legislative materials indicate that the 1952 codification had a dual purpose: (a) to record in the naturalization statute the disqualification forged by the selective service statutes, (b) to make certain that liabilities previously incurred under those statutes would not lapse. See S. Rep. 1515, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., pp. 725, 731.
Few would question the inherent reasonableness of the statutory plan. In honoring the alien's plea for relief from the draft Congress gave the alien "a choice of exemption and no citizenship, or no exemption and citizenship." Moser v. United States, 1951, 341 U.S. 41, 46, 71 S.Ct. 553, 556, 95 L.Ed. 729. An alien who made a voluntary choice to escape military service necessarily accepted the concomitant loss of naturalization privileges. Petition of Skender, 2 Cir., 1957, 248 F.2d 92, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 931, 78 S.Ct. 411, 2 L.Ed. 2d 413; Giz v. Brownell, 1956, 99 U.S. App.D.C. 339, 240 F.2d 25; Savoretti v. Small, 5 Cir., 1957, 244 F.2d 292. A key consideration is that this is a perpetual ban. It could be urged, perhaps, that allowance should be made for the passage of time or for change in circumstances, but Congress has not authorized such alleviation.
One perplexing situation is confronted when the alien who has applied for exemption later becomes available for military service, either through his voluntary choice or upon a change in the statute or regulation. The selective service laws have not dealt with this contingency and the selective service regulations never have directly sanctioned a withdrawal of the exemption application. It has been argued that an alien who later became available for military participation was not relieved from military duty and consequently is not debarred from citizenship. Petition of Caputo, D.C.E.D.1954, 118 F.Supp. 870; Kiviranta v. Brownell, D.C.1956, 141 F. Supp. 435. But when the alien's availability did not culminate in physical induction, this hypothesis is rejected by an overwhelming array of authorities, including Petition of Cuozzo's Naturalization, 3 Cir., 1956, 235 F.2d 184; Brownell v. Rasmussen, 1956, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 300, 235 F.2d 527, certiorari dismissed 355 U.S. 859, 78 S.Ct. 114, 2 L.Ed.2d 66; Giz v. Brownell, 1956, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 339, 240 F.2d 25; United States v. Kenny, 2 Cir., 1957, 247 F.2d 139; Jubran v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 255 F.2d 81.
The picture is quite different, however, when the alien actually has become a member of the armed forces. It is utterly incongruous to suppose that a person who in fact has worn the uniform and has performed military functions should be denied the naturalization boon because of a relinquished exemption claim. A distinction doubtless...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Hoellger
... ... court, in an unreported decision, granted the petition for naturalization of appellee, Otto Hoellger, and the ... Calif.1957, 154 F.Supp. 525;8 Petition of Felleson", N.D.Ill.1958, 169 F.Supp. 471, 472.7, 8 ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Gallarde v. I.N.S.
... ... IMMIGRATION and NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee ... No. 04-56353 ... petition, holding that § 315 barred him from becoming a citizen ... and intelligently waive citizenship); Petition of Felleson, 169 F.Supp. 471, 473-74 (N.D.Ill.1958) (excepting alien ... ...
-
Matter of H----
... ... of deportation proceedings to permit filing petition for naturalization will not be authorized where ... 2, 1960); Petition for Naturalization of Felleson, 169 F. Supp. 471 (D.C. Ill., 1958); and Petition of ... ...
- Carter v. American Bus Lines, Inc.