Petition of Felton, No. 8556

• Court: United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
• Writing for the Court: PORTER and SMITH, JJ., and CRAMER and SPEAR
• Citation: 79 Idaho 325,316 P.2d 1064
• Docket Number: No. 8556
• Decision Date: 28 October 1957
• Parties: Petition of J. H. FELTON for Refund and Cancellation of Taxes.

Page 1064

316 P.2d 1064 79 Idaho 325 Petition of J. H. FELTON for Refund and Cancellation of Taxes. No. 8556. Supreme Court of Idaho. Oct. 28, 1957.

[79 Idaho 327]

Page 1065

Graydon W. Smith, Atty. Gen., Elbert Gass, Edward Aschenbrener, Asst. Attys. Gen., Lloyd G. Martinson, Pros. Atty., Cope R. Gale, Asst. Pros. Atty., Moscow, for appellant.

[79 Idaho 329] J. H. Felton, Lewiston, for respondent.

TAYLOR Justice.

Respondent acquired certain property in Latah county in 1955. June 13, 1955, he appeared before the board of commissioners asking relief from taxes for the years 1952 and 1953. July 7, 1955, respondent paid the taxes for the year 1952. July 8, 1955, he again appeared before the board with the request that the taxes for the years 1952, 1953, and 1954 be cancelled in part. The except from the minutes of this meeting appearing in the record does not show whether the board was sitting as a board of commissioners or as a board of equalization. July 11, 1955, 'The Board of County Commissioners, sitting as a Board of Equalization,' denied the respondent's request for cancellation of a portion of the 1952, 1953 and 1954 taxes, and his request for a refund of taxes paid. Purporting to act under authority of §§ 31-1509 and 31-1510, I.C., respondent appealed to the district court 'from that certain Order of the Board of County Commissioners made on or about July 11, 1955.' The issue of excessive valuation of the property by the assessor was tried de novo in the district court. The court concluded that:

[79 Idaho 330] 'The assessed values for the years 1952, 1953, and 1954, as determined by the Assessor of Latah County, State of Idaho, for petitioner's property were unlawful and unequal and not based upon the full cash value of the property, but were based upon an arbitrary and unreasonable 1937 to 1941 replacement cost of the buildings and an arbitrary value of the personal property having no relationship to full cash value.'

In its findings the court fixed the assessment value for the three years at less than the fixed by the assessor, and in its decree ordered a refund of a portion of the tax collected for 1952 and the cancellation of a portion of the taxes for the years 1953 and 1954. From this judgment the board appeals.

The county board of commissioners and the county board of equalization are two separate and distinct bodies, with separate and distinct powers and duties. General Custer Mining Co. v. Van Camp, 2 Idaho, Hasb., 40, 3 P. 22; Feltham v. Board of Com'rs, 10 Idaho 182, 77 P. 332.

If the action taken on July 11th was by the board of equalization, as the minutes recite, then the district court would acquire no jurisdiction, since the statute provides that appeals from the county board of equalization are to be taken to the state tax commission (§ 63-2210, I.C., as amended; Utah Oil Refining Co. v. Hendrix, 72 Idaho 407, 242 P.2d 124) and then from the order of the state tax commission to the district court (§ 63-2214, I.C.). No appeal is provided from the county board of equalization to the district court. Hence, an attempted appeal to the district court from such board would confer no jurisdiction upon the district court. Const. Art. 5, § 20; Humbird Lbr. Co. v. Morgan, 10 Idaho 327, 77 P. 433.

If the board was actually sitting as a board of equalization and respondent's request for abatement of his taxes was addressed to it, and considered by it, as such, then the board acted without jurisdiction. The county board of equalization is a constitutional body 'whose duty it shall be to equalize the valuation of the taxable property in the county, under such rules and regulations of the state tax commission as shall be prescribed by law.' Const. Art. 7, § 12. It is required to meet on the fourth

Page 1066

Monday of June each year for the purpose of equalizing the assessment of property on the real property roll, and on the first Monday in July for the purpose of equalizing the assessment of property on the personal property roll of the county, 'and shall continue in session from day to day and shall determine complaints in regard to the assessment of such property * * * and must complete such business and adjourn as a board of equalization on the second Monday of July * * *.' § 63-401, I.C.

'* * * The board must determine all complaints in regard to the assessed [79 Idaho 331] value of any property entered upon said rolls, and must, except as prohibited in this act, correct any valuation entered upon said rolls by adding thereto or subtracting therefrom such amount as may be necessary in order to make such valuation conform to the full cash value, * * *.' § 63-402, I.C.

On the second Monday of July the board of county commissioners must deliver the real and personal property assessment rolls, as corrected, to the county auditor. The auditor must prepare an abstract of such rolls and file a duplicate thereof in his own office when completed and transmit the originals to the state tax commission on or before the fourth Monday of July. §§ 63-412 and 63-413, I.C. Upon its adjournment, and delivery of the...