Petition of National Bulk Carriers

• Citation: 143 F. Supp. 46
• Parties: Petition of NATIONAL BULK CARRIERS, Inc., as owner of THE steamship PAN GEORGIA for exoneration from or limitation of liability.
• Decision Date: 18 July 1956
• Court: U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

143 F. Supp. 46

Petition of NATIONAL BULK CARRIERS, Inc., as owner of THE steamship PAN GEORGIA for exoneration from or limitation of liability.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 18, 1956.

Samuel D. Antopol, New York City, for petitioner, National Bulk Carriers Inc.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., for claimants Donaldson Towing, etc. and the Curtis Bay Towing, etc.

Brenner, Hannan & Murphy, New York City, for claimant, Louis A. Acord.

LEVET, District Judge.

The claimants herein, Donaldson Towing & Lightering Company, a Delaware corporation, and the Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania, a Pennsylvania corporation, have moved pursuant to Admiralty Rule 54, 28 U.S.C.A. and Section 1404(a) of Title 28 U.S.C.A. to transfer this proceeding to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. This is a proceeding in admiralty brought by petitioner, National Bulk Carriers Inc., a Delaware corporation, as owner of the steamship Pan Georgia for exoneration from or limitation of liability with respect to a fire and explosion on petitioner's vessel which occurred on July 23, 1953 at Wilmington, Delaware. The tugs J. H. Deinlein and Wotoco were alongside the Pan Georgia when the accident occurred. The claimant Donaldson Towing & Lightering Company was the owner of said tugs and the claimant the Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania was the bareboat charterer thereof.

Numerous claims were filed in this proceeding, all of which have been compromised and settled by the petitioner, with the exception of the two claimants herein and a personal injury claim which is alleged to be relatively minor in nature and amount. It appears that the limitation fund in this proceeding is substantially greater than the aggregate undisposed claims.

Prior to the commencement of this proceeding, the two claimants, as owner and bareboat charterer of the aforesaid tugs, each instituted separate proceedings for exoneration from or limitation of liability in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. These proceedings involve the same accident as is involved herein. Claims for damages similar to those filed in this proceeding were filed in the Philadelphia proceedings, including the claim of the petitioner herein for its losses and damages. It is alleged that the limitation funds in the Philadelphia proceedings are substantially less than the remaining undisposed claims. Petitioner, National Bulk Carriers Inc., has moved to transfer the Philadelphia proceedings to this district. Decision on this motion is being withheld pending the disposition of claimants' motion for transfer of the instant proceeding to Philadelphia.

Admiralty Rule 54 permits transfer of limitation proceedings "to any district for the convenience of the parties." Section 1404(a) of Title 28 U.S.C.A. adds two additional factors, namely the convenience of the witnesses and the interest of justice. The courts in this district have held that Section 1404(a) also applies to admiralty. Torres v. Steamship Rosario, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1954, 125 F.Supp. 496, affirmed Torres v. Walsh, 2 Cir., 221 F.2d 319; Texas Company v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1953, 116 F.Supp. 915, affirmed Petition of Texas Co., 2 Cir., 213 F.2d 479, 482; Arrowhead Co. v. The Aimee...