Pfenning v. Lineman
| Docket Number | 27S02-1006-CV-331 |
| Decision Date | 18 May 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
141 cases
-
Pellham v. Let's Go Tubing, Inc.
...980 N.E.2d 933, 957 N.Y.S.2d 268 (2012) ; Cole v. Boy Scouts of America, 397 S.C. 247, 725 S.E.2d 476, 478 (2011) ; Pfenning v. Lineman, 947 N.E.2d 392, 404 (Ind. 2011) ; Yoneda v. Tom, 110 Haw. 367, 133 P.3d 796, 808 (2006) ; Peart v. Ferro, 119 Cal.App.4th 60, 13 Cal.Rptr.3d 885, 898 (200......
-
Bertin v. Mann
...all risks incidental to the particular game, sport, or contest which are obvious and foreseeable[.]"); see also Pfenning v. Lineman , 947 N.E.2d 392, 398, 404 (Ind. 2011) (addressing claims against a participant of a sport by examining the breach of duty—the existence of which includes aski......
-
Eubanks v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.
...an accident. “Absent a duty, there can be no breach, and therefore, no recovery for the plaintiff in negligence.” Pfenning v. Lineman, 947 N.E.2d 392, 398 (Ind.2011) ( quotation omitted ). The evidence submitted is uncontroverted. No matter how generously viewed in the non-movant's favor, t......
-
Schmitz v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
...should have withstood a motion to dismiss.4 The elements of a negligence claim under Indiana law are identical. See Pfenning v. Lineman, 947 N.E.2d 392, 398 (Ind.2011).5 Similar to Ohio law, the Indiana Supreme Court has set forth a three-part test balancing the following factors to decide ......
Get Started for Free