Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit Union

Decision Date19 October 1921
Citation201 P. 222,103 Or. 514
PartiesPHEZ CO. v. SALEM FRUIT UNION ET AL.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; George G. Bingham and Percy R. Kelly, Judges.

Action by the Phez Company against the Salem Fruit Union and others. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff to enforce by injunction the performance by defendant Salem Fruit Union of a contract entered into on May 24, 1917, between the Northwest Fruit Products Company, plaintiff's predecessor, and the defendant, whereby defendant agreed to sell and deliver to plaintiff's predecessor about 1,200 tons of fresh loganberries of the crops of 1917, 1918, 1919, 1920, and 1921, at the agreed price of 3 cents per pound for the crop season of 1917, and thereafter during the remaining years at the rate of $61.50 per ton. Said berries were to consist of the entire crops of certain growers named therein and including those mentioned made defendants in this action. The contract is designated Exhibit A to plaintiff's complaint, and its due execution is not disputed. Said exhibit is too long to be set out in this statement, but such features of it as are essential are referred to in the opinion.

The complaint alleges that contemporaneously with the execution of Exhibit A the defendant Salem Fruit Union, for the protection of itself and plaintiff's predecessor, entered into a written agreement with each of the defendant growers of loganberries, which contract provided that each grower should sell and deliver to the fruit union all the loganberries grown during the years above mentioned upon certain specified tracts of land, the acreage and estimated tonnage of each tract being particularly specified. Other conditions of this contract are as follows:

"3. The grower agrees that his fruit may be sold and the proceeds prorated under such pooling system as is now used or shall hereafter be adopted by the union.

"4. The grower agrees that the union shall have, and he hereby gives and grants to the union, a first lien or crop mortgage on all his crop of fruit growing or to be grown on said premises to secure the payment of any indebtedness now owing by him to the union or any indebtedness which he shall hereafter incur to said union by virtue of this contract or transactions arising thereunder. The grower hereby authorizes and instructs the union to deduct from the proceeds of the sale of his fruit any sums which he may owe the union.

"5. The union agrees to receive, store and market said grower's fruit, provided said fruit is, in the judgment of the union, of marketable standard and quality, and it is understood and agreed that the union shall not be liable for any unavoidable loss, damage or injury, or for any unavoidable failure to secure storage or to sell said fruit.

"6. The union agrees to pay over to the grower the entire proceeds of the sale of his fruit after deducting such amounts as the grower shall then be indebted to the union such indebtedness to include all handling and marketing charges as filed and assessed by the board of directors of the union, which charges shall be sufficient to pay the general operating expenses; such indebtedness shall also include all the accounts for supplies purchased, for stock subscribed or money advanced.

"7. The grower hereby appoints the union his exclusive agent and hereby gives said union an exclusive right to sell said fruit.

"8. Whereas the union must provide for the payment of certain overhead expenses and fixed charges and must expend such sums as are necessary to keep in touch with crop and market conditions and must provide warehouse and storage facilities in proportion to the tonnage contracted; and whereas such expenses should be prorated over all of the fruit contracted to be sold, the grower therefore agrees that in the event he withholds his fruit or any part thereof in contravention of this agreement, he will pay to the union for each package of fruit so withheld as liquidated damages for such violation of his contract, the sum of ten cents (10 c.) for each box of apples or pears ten cents (10 c.) for each crate of berries or cherries five cents (5 c.) for each crate or box of prunes or peaches, and for other varieties of fruit an amount in such proportion to above charge made for apples as the average market price of apples during the season in which the violation occurred.

"9. The grower agrees that in the event suit or action is brought to recover for supplies furnished, services rendered or expenses incurred or to enforce any of the provisions of this contract, to pay such attorneys' fees in such suit or action as the court shall adjudge reasonable.

"10. It is mutually understood and agreed that this contract shall remain in effect for a period of time from date until March 1, 19--, and every year thereafter continually until canceled by one of the parties hereto, providing that it shall only be canceled on the first day of March of any year after said period by the party so canceling giving notice in writing to the other party thereto during the twenty days prior to said March first, that he desires to cancel his contract; provided, however, that neither party shall cancel this contract until that party shall have fully paid any indebtedness due by it or him to the other party, including all stock subscriptions due or to come due or notes given for the same."

It further appears that about January, 1918, the defendant union secured from a large majority of the growers a contract materially modifying the contract as it appears in Exhibit B above set out. The form of such modification is set forth as Exhibit C to the complaint, and is as follows:

"This agreement, made this _____ day of _____, 19--, by and between Salem Fruit Union, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the union, and _____ of the county of _____, state of Oregon hereinafter referred to as the grower, witnesseth, that for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained, the said grower does hereby constitute and appoint the said union, as his sole and lawful agent, to enter into contract for him, and on his behalf, and in his name, for the sale of all the loganberries to be grown upon his premises for the years 1918 to 1921, inclusive, which crop of berries shall be delivered to said union to be sold by it, with other growers entering into similar contracts with such union, which shall constitute a pool, and shall be designated as the '1917 Five-Year Loganberry Pool,' which said pool shall be sold in its entirety by said union to the Northwest Fruit Products Company, at three and one-half cents (31/2 cents) per pound net to said grower, and the grower, as part of said pool, hereby gives the said union full power of attorney to make said sale.

"That the yard herein mentioned consists of approximately _____ acres and is located near _____, Marion county, Oregon, and the crop of the year 19--is estimated at _____ tons.

"That said berries, in the judgment of the union, shall be marketable and of standard quality, to be delivered by the grower to the Northwest Fruit Products Company or its assigns at their factory or subject to their order, in accordance with terms and conditions of said authorized contract. Grower agrees to care for and harvest the crop in a husbandlike manner.

"In case said Northwest Fruit Products Company shall fail by reason of act of God or public enemy or other unavoidable occurrences, to perform its part of such agreement, or any part thereof, entered into with said union as the agent of the grower, the said grower agrees that his said fruit may be handled in said pool with the fruit of other growers making contracts similar to this, for any year or years or portions of a year that the Northwest Fruit Products Company shall be so prevented from fulfilling its part of the agreement, in which event said union shall market said fruit as a continuation of the said five-year loganberry pool of 1917, to the best advantage of the grower as the judgment of the board of directors of said union may dictate. The said grower shall receive his pro rata of the net returns for the sale of said pool after deducting for the services in the handling and marketing of such fruit, the charges and assessments that may be made by the board of directors of said union, which may be deducted from the amount of the money received from the sale of said fruit before paying the same to the grower.

"The grower agrees that in the event of suit or action brought to recover for supplies furnished, services rendered or expenses incurred or to enforce any of the provisions of this contract, to pay such attorney's fees in such suit or action as the court shall adjudge reasonable.

"It is understood that the conditions herein contained shall run with the land on which said berries are to be raised, and shall bind the parties herein, their heirs, administrators and assigns and shall continue to be in full force and effect during the crop years of 1918, 1919, 1920 and 1921. It being understood that upon the execution of this contract, the former contract heretofore entered into on the _____ day of _____, 19--, between the undersigned grower and said union, shall become null and void and of no effect, except that the pool created by such agreement shall be continued by this agreement. This agreement is binding upon the successors and assigns of each party hereto.

"In witness whereof, the said parties have hereunto set their hands this _____ day of _____, 19--.

Salem Fruit Union,

"By ________

"_________

"Grower."

The complaint alleges that plaintiff and its predecessor in interest have been at all times...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit Union
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 11 Abril 1922
    ...Court, Marion County; Geo. G. Bingham and Percy R. Kelly, Judges. On petition for rehearing. Petition denied. For former opinion, see 201 P. 222. John H. McNary, W. C. Winslow, and William Trindle, all of Salem, for appellant. Oscar Hayter, of Dallas, and Roy F. Shields, of Salem (Smith & S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT