Philadelphia Dairy Products Co., Inc. v. Summit Sweets Shoppe, Inc.
Decision Date | 26 July 1933 |
Citation | 167 A. 667 |
Parties | PHILADELPHIA DAIRY PRODUCTS CO., Inc. v. SUMMIT SWEETS SHOPPE, Inc. |
Court | New Jersey Court of Chancery |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. Distribution of the estate in possession of the receiver, which is insufficient to pay expenses of receivership and allowed claims in full, are payable in the following order of priority and preference: (1) Expenses of administration of receivership; (2) claims of employees for wages due for work performed and services rendered within two months next preceding filing of bill of complaint herein; (3) franchise taxes; (4) municipal taxes; (5) claim of landlord against corporation for not exceeding one year's rent; (6) claims of other preferred creditors; (7) claims of general creditors.
2. Expenses of receivership administration comprehend allowances to receiver and his counsel, master's fees, appraisers' fees, auditors' fees, rent for use and occupation of store premises, claims for merchandise, electricity, and gas, and wage claims of persons employed by receiver, all of which incurred by receiver in conducting the business of the corporation under authority of court order.
Suit by the Philadelphia Dairy Products, Inc., against the Summit Sweets Shoppe, Inc.
Order in accordance with opinion.
Wright, VanderBurgh & McCarthy, of Hackensack, for complainant and receiver.
Dalrymple & Campbell, of Newark, for Public Service Electric & Gas Co.
Arthur E. Dienst, of Newark, for Eric Schultz and others.
John M. Enright, of McDermott, Enright & Carpenter, of Jersey City, for Journal Square Bank Bldg. Co.
I. Harold Meyerson, of Newark, for Albert Pick-Barth Co.
Alexander Raskin (of Raskin & Hornstein), of Jersey City, for Peckman Show Case & Fixture Co.
Hamilton Cross, of Jersey City, for Liquid Carbonic Co. and Dry Kold Refrigerating Co.
Samuel M. Coombs, Jr., of Jersey City, for General Motors Acceptance Corporation.
FALLON, Vice Chancellor.
The matter sub judice is the distribution of the estate of the defendant insolvent corporation in possession of the receiver herein and a determination of priority and preference of claimants.
The receivership estate is insufficient to pay expenses of the administration of the receivership and all allowed claims in full; therefore the expenses of the administration of the receivership must first be paid, next in order will be claims of employees of the defendant for wages due to them for work performed and services rendered within two months next preceding...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lucas v. Manufacturing Lumbermen's Underwriters
... ... S. 1939; ... State ex rel. Carwood Realty Co. v. Dinwiddie, 343 ... Mo. 592, 596, 122 S.W.2d ... 133, 55 ... A. L. R. 275; Philadelphia Dairy Products Co. v. Summitt ... Sweets Shoppe, ... 1939; Report of Alfred M. Best & Co., Inc., of September 16, ... 1940, and of May 19, ... ...
-
Supreme Fuel Sales Co. v. Peerless Plush Mfg. Co.
...J. Eq. 78, 142 A. 312; Franklin Lumber Co. v, Harold Anderson, Inc., 104 N. J. Eq. 306, 145 A. 477; Philadelphia Dairy Products Co. v. Summit Sweets Shoppe, 113 N. J. Eq. 458, 167 A. 667, as is urged by petitioners. All of those cases merely hold that, since the receiver represents the cour......
-
Holly Knitwear, Inc., In re
...489. See also Whitehead v. Whitehead Pottery Co., 115 N.J.Eq. 257, 170 A. 830 (Ch.1937) and Philadelphia Dairy Prod. Co. Inc. v. Summit Sweets Shoppe Inc., 113 N.J.Eq. 458, 167 A. 667 (Ch.1933). Furthermore, the Loft Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:44--165 et seq., does not affect the priority of the wage......
-
Bowes v. U.S.
...the discretion of the legislatures to which the States commit the exercise of the power." In Philadelphia Dairy Products Co., Inc., v. Summit Sweets Shoppe, Inc., 113 NJ. Eq. 458, 167 A. 667, the court, among other things, said: "* * * The well-established rule is to pay first the general e......