Philadelphia, Newtown and New York Railroad Co. v. Cooper
Decision Date | 03 March 1884 |
Citation | 105 Pa. 239 |
Parties | Philadelphia, Newtown and New York Railroad Co. et al. v. Cooper. |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
January 31, 1884
1. An entry by a corporation invested with the right of eminent domain, upon private land without first making compensation to the owner or giving adequate security therefor, is a trespass. Until such compensation is made or security given the full title to the premises is in the private owner, and he may maintain ejectment for their recovery.
2. Where land was taken by a railroad corporation without first paying or securing compensation, and the private owner subsequently agreed with the corporation to accept a specific sum for the right of way over his property, to be paid within twenty days after the issuance of certain bonds contemplated by said corporation, and the agreement was never executed by the payment of said purchase money:
Held, in an action of ejectment brought by the private owner against the corporation to recover said property, that the unexecuted agreement could not be set up to defeat the plaintiff's right of recovery.
Before MERCUR, C. J., GORDON, PAXSON, TRUNKEY, STERRETT, GREEN and CLARK, JJ.
ERROR to the Court of Common Pleas, No. 2, of Philadelphia County: Of January Term, 1884, No. 61.
Ejectment by James E. Cooper against the Philadelphia, Newtown and New York Railroad Company, and the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company, to recover possession of a certain lot of ground in Philadelphia county.
The following facts appeared upon the trial: The Philadelphia Newtown and New York Railroad Company, a corporation chartered under the provisions of the General Railroad Act of 1849, and its supplements, in 1872 took possession of the ground in question, then belonging to James E. Cooper, by virtue of its right of eminent domain, for the purpose of constructing a railroad. Prior to its entry it neither paid Cooper for said land, nor tendered him security for such compensation. On July 8, 1873, it entered into the following agreement with Cooper:
This agreement was made by both parties in anticipation that the Pennsylvania Railroad Company would endorse or guarantee the bonds mentioned in said agreement, which the Philadelphia Newtown and New York Railroad Company then contemplated issuing, but the former company finally refused to do this in the fall of 1873, and no payment was ever made to Cooper under the above agreement. The Philadelphia, Newtown and New York R. R. Company became insolvent in 1876, and all its property and franchises were sold by the sheriff to Benjamin Smith et al., by whom they were subsequently conveyed to a new corporation, under the same name. This company leased their road to the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company, and, with the last named corporation, is the defendant in this...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Foehr v. New York Short Line Railroad Co.
... ... -- Defendant was a trespasser: Keil v. Gas ... Co., 131 Pa. 466; Railroad Co. v. Cooper, 105 ... Pa. 239; Gilmore v. Pittsburg, etc., R. R. Co., 104 ... Pa. 275; Justice v. Railroad ... 263; Allen v. Willard, 57 ... Pa. 374 at p. 381, and Stork v. Philadelphia, 199 ... Pa. 462, 49 A. 236, may be appropriately cited. The control ... retained by the ... ...
-
Johnston v. Callery
...which ejectment will lie: Williamsport R.R. v. R.R., 141 Pa. 407; McClinton v. R.R., 66 Pa. 404; Dimmick v. Brodhead, 75 Pa. 464; R.R. v. Cooper, 105 Pa. 239; Penna. R.R. Eby, 107 Pa. 166; W.P. & B.R.R. v. Warrell, 122 Pa. 613; Keil v. Gas Co., 131 Pa. 466. The estate of the owner is not di......
-
Warrell v. Wheeling Etc. R. Co
... ... the Wheeling, Pittsburgh & Baltimore Railroad Co., to recover ... a strip of land containing 5.22 acres, ... counsel cited: (1) Philad. etc. R. Co. v. Cooper, ... 105 Pa. 239; McClinton v. Railroad Co., 66 Pa. 404; ... ...
-
Jones v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
...in the face of the agreement: Greenwalt v. Horner, 6 S. & R. 71; Bird v. Randall, 3 Burr. 1353; Gilmore v. Wilson, 53 Pa. 194; Phila. R. Co. v. Cooper, 105 Pa. 239. a refusal of the wife to join in conveying would prevent specific performance, could not make the plaintiff's conduct equitabl......