Philadelphia Underwriters' Agency v. Driggers
| Decision Date | 08 March 1922 |
| Docket Number | (No. 2996.) |
| Citation | Philadelphia Underwriters' Agency v. Driggers, 238 S.W. 633, 111 Tex. 392 (Tex. 1922) |
| Parties | PHILADELPHIA UNDERWRITERS' AGENCY OF FIRE INS. ASS'N OF PHILADELPHIA et al. v. DRIGGERS et al. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action by W. F. Driggers and others against the Philadelphia Underwriters' Agency of the Fire Insurance Association of Philadelphia and another. Judgment for the plaintiffs, and defendants appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which certified to the Supreme Court questions as to the validity of clauses in the policies relied on by the defendants. Clauses held valid.
Crane & Crane, of Dallas, for appellants.
Smoot & Smoot, of Wichita Falls, for appellees.
This cause is here on certified questions from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Seventh District. The certificate, with the questions submitted, is as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.
...rendered nugatory by article 4874a of Vernon's Sayles' Revised Statutes of Texas of 1914. In the case of Philadelphia Underwriters' Agency v. Driggers (Tex. Civ. App.) 238 S. W. 633, our Supreme Court, speaking though Chief Justice Cureton, construing said statute, says: "This act has refer......
-
In re Lloyds
...under oath as a condition precedent to sustaining a suit on the policy are valid. See Philadelphia Underwriters' Agency of Fire Ins. Ass'n v. Driggers, 111 Tex. 392, 238 S.W. 633, 635 (Tex.1922); Trahan v. Fire Ins. Exch., 179 S.W.3d 669, 673–674 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2005, no pet.); Lidawi v.......
-
Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. Vela
...not bar the right or constitute a basis for entering a take nothing judgment. See Philadelphia Underwriters' Agency of Fire Insurance Association of Philadelphia v. Driggers, 111 Tex. 392, 238 S.W. 633. The notice provisions quoted above do not constitute a defense to the suit for damages, ......
-
Clark v. State Farmers Ins. Co.
... ... might contribute to or bring about a fire loss. Philadelphia ... Underwriters Agency of Fire Ins. Ass'n v. Driggers, 111 ... Tex ... ...