Philadelphia v. Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Co.

Citation33 Pa. 41
PartiesThe City of Philadelphia versus The Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Co.
Decision Date01 January 1859
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

A. Miller, for the plaintiff in error.

St. G. T. Campbell, for the defendant in error.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LOWRIE, J.

The municipal authorities paved the Gray's Ferry road for a considerable distance, at a place where it lies side by side with the defendants' railroad, and now seek to charge them with the half of the cost of it; but they cannot do it. Their claim has no foundation either in the letter of the law or in its spirit, nor in the form of the remedy. Not in the letter, because the defendants do not own the land sought to be charged, and have only their right of way over it. Not in the spirit, because the paving laws are means of compulsory contribution among the common sharers in a common benefit, and as a railroad cannot, from its very nature, derive any benefit from the paving, while all the rest of the neighbourhood may, we cannot presume that the compulsion was intended to be applied to them. Not in the form of the remedy, because the execution for this sort of claim is levari facias, a writ not commonly allowed against corporations, and which would hardly produce much when directed against a public right of way. It would be strange legislation that would authorize the soil of one public road to be taxed, in order to raise funds to make or improve a neighbouring one.

Judgment affirmed.

* This case was decided in 1856.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Northern P. Ry. Co. v. City of Seattle
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • August 1, 1907
    ... ... railroad track; and that the land will be benefited and its ... 279, ... 19 Am. Rep. 534; City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia, ... etc., R. Co., 33 Pa. 41; ... ...
  • Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Corp. v. Richland County, a Municipal Corporation
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1914
    ... ... to determine adverse claims in and to a railroad right of ... way. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff ... Pacific R. Co. 72 Mo.App. 271; ... Philadelphia v. Philadelphia, W. & B. R. Co. 33 Pa ... 41; ... 255, 4 Am. Rep. 63; Mt. Pleasant v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. 138 ... Pa. 365, 11 L.R.A. 520, 20 A. 1052 ... ...
  • Kansas City v. Bacon
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1898
    ...the right of way can not be benefited. [Muscatine v. Railroad, 88 Iowa 291, 55 N.W. 100. Bridgeport v. Railroad, 36 Conn. 255; Philadelphia v. Railroad, 33 Pa. 41.] court in Nevada to use v. Eddy, 123 Mo. 546, 27 S.W. 471, declined to pass upon the question because not fairly presented on t......
  • Heman Construction Co. v. Wabash Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 13, 1907
    ... ... 255; Railroad v ... Grand Rapids, 106 Mich. 13; Philadelphia v ... Railroad, 33 Pa. 41; Railroad v. Philadelphia, ... 88 Pa. 424; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT