Philibert v. Kluser
Decision Date | 30 September 2015 |
Docket Number | A156192.,13CV01410 |
Citation | 274 Or.App. 195,361 P.3d 610 (Mem) |
Parties | Stacie PHILIBERT, in her capacity as guardian ad litem for Cameron Hollenbeck–Hatch and Domanick Hollenbeck–Hatch, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Dennis Dixon KLUSER, Defendant–Respondent. |
Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
Kathryn H. Clarkeargued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Tim Williams.
Flavio A. Ortiz, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Martin M. Rail and Lachenmeier Enloe Rail & Ortiz.
Opinion
Affirmed. Saechao v. Matsakoun,78 Or.App. 340, 717 P.2d 165, rev. dismissed,302 Or. 155, 727 P.2d 126 (1986).
To continue reading
Request your trial2 cases
-
Philibert v. Kluser
...The trial court dismissed the action and the Court of Appeals affirmed, both relying on the "impact rule." Philibert v. Kluser , 274 Or.App. 195, 361 P.3d 610 (2015). The impact rule allows a plaintiff to seek damages for negligently caused emotional distress only if the plaintiff can show ......
- Dep't of Human Servs. v. J.C.H. (In re C.M.H.)