Philip Meyer Co. v. Sheboygan Chair Co.

Citation102 Wis. 535,78 N.W. 1119
PartiesPHILIP MEYER CO. v. SHEBOYGAN CHAIR CO.
Decision Date04 April 1899
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from circuit court, Sheboygan county; N. S. Gilson, Judge.

Action by the Philip Meyer Company against the Sheboygan Chair Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

*1119Benfey & Benfey, for appellant. Francis Williams, for respondent.

DODGE, J.

No advantage can be gained from a discussion in the opinion of the facts in this case. Suffice it to say that, after a careful examination, we do not find any clear preponderance of evidence against the finding of the court that “the plaintiff did not manufacture for the defendant, in accordance with its order and agreement, the articles sued for, and did not deliver the same to said defendant in accordance with any agreement to purchase the same by said defendant,” whether that finding is intended to repudiate the making of an agreement in fact by defendant's foreman, or his authority on their behalf. That finding sustains the judgment. Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Bartle v. Bartle
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 20 Junio 1907
    ...below unless against the clear preponderance of the evidence. Treseder v. Burgor, 130 Wis. 201, 109 N. W. 957;Philip Meyer Co. v. Sheboygan C. Co., 102 Wis. 535, 78 N. W. 1119;Crawford v. Christian et al., 102 Wis. 51, 78 N. W. 406;Guetzkow B. Co. v. Andrews & Co., 92 Wis. 214, 66 N. W. 119......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT