Philip Schneider Brewing Co. v. American Ice-Machine Co., 724.
Decision Date | 12 October 1896 |
Docket Number | 724. |
Citation | 77 F. 138 |
Parties | PHILIP SCHNEIDER BREWING CO. v. AMERICAN ICE-MACH. CO. [1] |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
This was an action brought in the United States circuit court for the district of Colorado by the American Ice-Machine Company the defendant in error, against the Philip Schneider Brewing Company, the plaintiff in error, to recover the balance of the purchase price of an ice-making machine, and the value of certain goods, wares, and merchandise. The complaint divides the plaintiff's claim into three causes of action, which are separately states. The first is founded on a contract for an ice machine purchased by the plaintiff in error from the defendant in error at the agreed price of $11,580, upon which it is averred payments have been made amounting to $7,723.57 leaving due the sum of $3,856.43. The complaint contained the usual averment that the plaintiff 'has fully complied with and performed all and singular the terms and conditions' of the contract upon its part. The second is founded on an account for apparatus known as 'temperators,' sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant at the agreed price of $1,200, and for a filter, sold and delivered at the agreed price of $250; and upon this account it is averred $1,393 was paid, leaving due thereon $57. The third is founded on an action for sundry items of goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant at the agreed price, and for the reasonable price and value of $1,639.19.
The following is a copy of the contract for the ice machine:
, well riveted and soldered water-tight, and provided with wrought iron band around top, to make blocks of ice weighing one hundred and fifty (150) pounds. All piping and tank work to be coated with the best quality of mineral waterproof paint, and the machine to be painted in an artistic manner, in keeping with this class of machinery. Material and workmanship throughout to be first-class and warranted, and the machine and plant, in all of their parts, to be constructed in accordance with the latest and best practice. We will guaranty that the machine, when properly operated, and at normal speed, shall have power and capacity to develop a refrigerating duty equivalent to that produced by the melting of twenty (20) tons of good, marketable ice per day of twenty-four hours. The said party of the first part further guarantees that the distilling and filtering apparatus, the freezing tank, and the evaporating coils shall have a capacity for the production of twelve tons of good, marketable ice per day of 24 hours. That the party of the first part will provide a good and competent engineer to remain with the machine and plant for a period of thirty days to give them a thorough test, and to instruct the engineer of the party of the second part in the handling and management of the same. That the party of the first part will erect the plant hereinbefore specified on the premises of the said party of the second part, ready to charge with ammonia, for the sum of eleven thousand, five hundred and eighty (11,580) dollars, the said party of the first part to make the main steam and exhaust connections to and from the machine. That the said party of the second part will pay to the party of the first part, as consideration for constructing and erecting the machine and plant, as hereinbefore specified, the said sum of eleven thousand five hundred and eighty dollars, as follows: First payment, the sum of $2,895.00 (two...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Weinstein v. Laughlin
...court for its consideration and when exception to such ruling is duly saved. This should dispose of the case. Schneider Brewing Co. v. American Ice Mach. Co. (C. C. A.) 77 F. 138; Keator Lumber Co. v. Thompson, 144 U. S. 434, 12 S. Ct. 669, 36 L. Ed. 495; Parks v. Turner, 12 How. (53 U. S.)......
-
Lesser Cotton Co. v. St. Louis, I.M. & S. Ry. Co.
... ... 349, 351, 19 U.S.App. 169, 171; ... Schneider Brewing Co. v. American Ice Mach. Co., 77 ... ...
-
Bankers' Sur. Co. v. Town of Holly
... ... 349, 351, 58 F. 530, 532; Philip ... Schneider Brewing Co. v. American Ice Mach ... ...
-
Travelers Mut. Casualty Co. v. Rector
...limiting liability, upon which they intended to rely. Kahnweiler v. Phenix Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 67 F. 483; Philip Schneider Brewing Co. v. American Ice-Mach. Co., 8 Cir., 77 F. 138, 145; Mechanics' Ins. Co., v. C. A. Hoover Distilling Co., 8 Cir., 182 F. 590, 597, 31 L.R.A.,N.S., 873; Ocean Ac......