Phillips v. New York
Decision Date | 01 October 1959 |
Docket Number | No. 497,497 |
Citation | 362 U.S. 456,4 L.Ed.2d 874,80 S.Ct. 874 |
Parties | Willard H. PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. NEW YORK |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York.
After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record which was only partially set forth in the petition for certiorari, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial11 cases
-
Gowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc Two Guys From v. Ginley Braunfeld v. Brown, HARRISON-ALLENTOW
......See Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Com'rs, 330 U.S. 552, 67 S.Ct. 910, 91 L.Ed. 1093; Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. Brownell, 294 U.S. 580, 55 S.Ct. 538, 79 L.Ed. 1070; Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U.S. 61, 31 S.Ct. 337, 55 L.Ed. 369; Atchison, T. & ...772. Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 8 Wall. 533, 19 L.Ed. 482; Arizona v. California, 283 U.S. 423, 51 S.Ct. 522, 75 L.Ed. 1154; Oklahoma ex rel. Phillips v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 313 U.S. 508, 61 S.Ct. 1050, 85 L.Ed. 1487. These litigants also argue, however, that when the state statutory provisions are ......
- State v. Sanchez, 12690
-
Public Service Elec. & Gas Co., In re
...... Those in the northern section are located in the eastern part thereof on waters in the general New York Bay area and those in the south are situate adjacent to the Delaware River in the western part of the section. The electricity produced must, of ......
- Town of Hamilton v. Department of Public Utilities
Request a trial to view additional results