Phillips v. State, 74--1432

Decision Date27 May 1975
Docket NumberNo. 74--1432,74--1432
CitationPhillips v. State, 313 So.2d 428 (Fla. App. 1975)
PartiesJack Dempsey PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Paul Morris, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Jack Dempsey Phillips, the defendant, appeals an order of the trial court denying a motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, RCrP.

Phillips was charged by information with one count of first degree murder and one count of assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree. He was tried, found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment in the state penitentiary on the first count and found guilty on the second count and sentenced to five years in the state penitentiary to begin upon expiration of the previous sentence. A direct appeal was taken to this court resulting in affirmance of the trial court's rulings. Subsequently, the defendant pro se filed a Rule 3.850 CrPR motion to vacate sentence and judgment, alleging that during the trial, a spectator in the courtroom gave signals to a prosecution witness and that a prosecution witness conferred with a detective during a recess after being instructed by the court not to discuss the case. The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing, stating

'The motion and the record clearly show that the defendant is entitled to no release (sic). I have personal knowledge of the matters raised in his motion for appeal and deem them to be without...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Ballard v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 1, 1978
    ...(Fla.1972); Ballard v. State, 323 So.2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Stallings v. State, 319 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Phillips v. State, 313 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Fulford v. State, 311 So.2d 203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Morrison v. State, 283 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); Yanks v. State......
  • Roth v. State, 80-870
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 10, 1980
    ...on a judgment. Harvey v. State, 383 So.2d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Clements v. State, 320 So.2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Phillips v. State, 313 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). The fact that the basis of the defendant's collateral attack is alleged to be one of constitutional dimension does not p......
  • Skinner v. State, s. 77-2018
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 16, 1979
    ...appeal save one. See: State v. Matera, 266 So.2d 661 (Fla.1972); Clements v. State, 320 So.2d 44 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Phillips v. State, 313 So.2d 428 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). In our view, the defendant's sentence of life imprisonment for unarmed robbery exceeded the statutory maximum for such crim......
  • Harvey v. State, 79-2205
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 20, 1980
    ...and thereby are unassailable in a collateral attack on the judgment. Clements v. State, 320 So.2d 44 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Phillips v. State, 313 So.2d 428 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). The fact that one of the grounds is of constitutional dimension does not mean that a waiver may not occur. Clark v. Sta......
  • Get Started for Free