Piccioli v. United States, No. 4

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM; MARSHALL
Citation88 S.Ct. 899,390 U.S. 202,19 L.Ed.2d 1034
Decision Date01 October 1967
Docket NumberNo. 4
PartiesCarl PICCIOLI v. UNITED STATES. *

390 U.S. 202
88 S.Ct. 899
19 L.Ed.2d 1034
Carl PICCIOLI

v.

UNITED STATES.*

No. 4.

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1967.
March 4, 1968

Alfred Belinkie, for petitioner Carl Piccioli.

Edward G. Burstein, for petitioner Pellegrino Millo.

David Goldstein and Jacob D. Zeldes, for petitioner Alfred Grassia.

Francis J. DiMento, Paul J. Burns and Ronald R. Popeo, for petitioners James J. Driscoll and others.

Albert J. Krieger and Robert Kasanof, for petitioners Joseph Serao and others.

Max M. Barr, for petitioner Samuel Wrieole.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding, for the United States in No. 4 and No. 2, Misc.

Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in Nos. 5, 6 and 10.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States in No. 32.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit, for the United States in No. 374.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments of the courts below are vacated, and the cases

Page 203

are remanded for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 716, 19 L.Ed.2d 889.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of Nos. in the consideration or decision of these cases.

* Together with No. 5, Millo v. United States; No. 6, Grassia v. United States; No. 10, Driscoll et al. v. United States; No. 32, Serao et al. v. United States; No. 374, Wrieole v. United States; and No. 2, Misc., Gjanci v. United States, all on petitions for writs of certiorari. Nos. 5, 6, 32, and 2, Misc., are to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 374 to the Third Circuit, and No. 10 to the First Circuit. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 2, Misc., is also granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
93 practice notes
  • U.S. v. Reed, Nos. 486
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 11 Abril 1978
    ...909, 87 S.Ct. 856, 17 L.Ed.2d 783 (1967); United States v. Conti, 361 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1966), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 204, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968); United States v. Monticallos, 349 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1965); United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837, 841-42 (2d Cir.), cert.......
  • U.S. v. Busic, Nos. 383
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 30 Octubre 1978
    ...412 U.S. 205, 93 S.Ct. 1993, 36 L.Ed.2d 844 (1973); Driscoll v. United States, 356 F.2d 324 (1st Cir. 1966), Vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 202, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1968). Compare United States v. Harary, 457 F.2d 471 (2d Cir. 1972) (entrapment fully exculpatory defense) with......
  • Bannister v. United States, No. 18073.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 7 Julio 1971
    ...the case for further consideration in the light of the Supreme Court's subsequent decisions in Marchetti and Grosso (390 U.S. 204, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968)), decisions which held that gamblers had a Fifth Amendment right to remain silent despite the statutory requirement that th......
  • U.S. v. Parker, No. 00-CR-053A.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of New York
    • 19 Abril 2001
    ...Astolas, 487 F.2d 275, 279 (2d Cir.1973) (citing United States v. Conti, 361 F.2d 153 (2d Cir.1966), rev'd on other grounds, 390 U.S. 204, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968)), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 955, 94 S.Ct. 1968, 40 L.Ed.2d 305 (1974). In such a case, a conviction will be sustained ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
93 cases
  • U.S. v. Reed, Nos. 486
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 11 Abril 1978
    ...909, 87 S.Ct. 856, 17 L.Ed.2d 783 (1967); United States v. Conti, 361 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1966), vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 204, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968); United States v. Monticallos, 349 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1965); United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837, 841-42 (2d Cir.), cert.......
  • U.S. v. Busic, Nos. 383
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 30 Octubre 1978
    ...412 U.S. 205, 93 S.Ct. 1993, 36 L.Ed.2d 844 (1973); Driscoll v. United States, 356 F.2d 324 (1st Cir. 1966), Vacated on other grounds, 390 U.S. 202, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1968). Compare United States v. Harary, 457 F.2d 471 (2d Cir. 1972) (entrapment fully exculpatory defense) with......
  • Bannister v. United States, No. 18073.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 7 Julio 1971
    ...the case for further consideration in the light of the Supreme Court's subsequent decisions in Marchetti and Grosso (390 U.S. 204, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968)), decisions which held that gamblers had a Fifth Amendment right to remain silent despite the statutory requirement that th......
  • U.S. v. Parker, No. 00-CR-053A.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of New York
    • 19 Abril 2001
    ...Astolas, 487 F.2d 275, 279 (2d Cir.1973) (citing United States v. Conti, 361 F.2d 153 (2d Cir.1966), rev'd on other grounds, 390 U.S. 204, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1968)), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 955, 94 S.Ct. 1968, 40 L.Ed.2d 305 (1974). In such a case, a conviction will be sustained ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT