Pickens County v. Jordan, 6 Div. 571.
Decision Date | 16 May 1940 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 571. |
Citation | 239 Ala. 589,196 So. 121 |
Parties | PICKENS COUNTY v. JORDAN. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Pickens County; J. Q. Smith, Judge.
Condemnation proceeding, commenced in probate court of Pickens County and appealed to circuit court, by Pickens County against James B Jordan. From a judgment fixing compensation for the land condemned, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Curry & Curry, of Carrollton, W. A. Davis, of Aliceville, and Jack M Pratt, of Carrollton, for appellant.
D. D. Patton, of Carrollton, for appellee.
The proceeding was for condemnation of land for a public highway. The only question presented is as to the amount of damages as compensation for the land taken for such right-of-way.
On appeal to the circuit court from an order of the probate court condemning land for a right-of-way the trial is de novo. Code, § 7492; Alabama Power Co. v. Henson, 237 Ala. 561, 187 So. 718.
The proper rule for the admeasurement of damages and compensation for taking of land for right-of-way to construct a public highway is the value of the land actually taken and consequent damage to adjoining lands and the commissioners or court in fixing the amount to be allowed the land owner must take into consideration the value of the enhancement to the remaining lands of such owner by reason of the construction of said highway. Code, § 7489; Acts of Alabama 1927, p. 492; Conecuh County v. Carter, 220 Ala. 668, 126 So. 132; McRea v. Marion County, 222 Ala. 511, 133 So. 278.
The court will take judicial knowledge of the location of the Town of Gordo and the population thereof as recorded by the Federal census. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 208 Ala. 228, 94 So. 466; Hodge v. Joy, 207 Ala. 198, 92 So. 171; Ex parte Fowler, 203 Ala. 98, 82 So. 112; Jackson Lumber Co. v. Trammell, 199 Ala. 536, 74 So. 469.
Pickens County acquired no absolute fee simple title to, but only the right to use the land for the purposes stated in its application. The compensation must be made for the value of the "land taken" under the statute. Michie's Code,§ 7489. In estimating such value, as to an easement, it has been held if anything would be left to the land owner of value consistent with the enjoyment of the easement, such use should also be considered. Stout v. Limestone County, 211 Ala. 227, 100 So. 352.
In the ascertainment of the value of the lands taken under and within the limitations of the statute there is no stereotyped form of question to be addressed to a witness shown to have knowledge of the value of the land, to enable the witness to express his judgment, in order that the value of the land may be ascertained by the jury. Alabama Power Co. v. Henson, 237 Ala. 561, 187 So. 718. In other words, whatever an intelligent buyer with a foreknowledge of the facts would estimate as an element of value of the land taken at the time of its condemnation may be considered. Alabama Power Co. v. Henson, supra; Ensign Yellow Pine Co. v. Hohenberg, 200 Ala. 149, 75 So. 897; Alabama Central R. R. Co. v. Musgrove, 169 Ala. 424, 53 So. 1009.
In the ascertainment of compensation to be awarded on condemnation of lands under § 7489, Michie's Code, it has been held that it is improper to admit evidence of the amount of damages assessed or paid on condemnation to owners of other adjoining or adjacent lands.
The Constitution requires that "just compensation" first be made before lands are condemned. Constitution 1901, Art. 1, § 23, Art. XII, § 235. The compensation required by statute is thus stated:
In Rudder v. Limestone County, 220 Ala. 485, 125 So. 670, 675, 68 A.L.R. 776, which was a case under the amended statute involving public roads, it was held that,
As to the ascertainment of value, it is declared in Rudder v. Limestone County, supra, as follows: In the case of "Alabama Cent. R. Co. v. Musgrove, 169 Ala. 424, 53 So. 1009, condemnation sought was under the statutes and the Constitution of 1901; just compensation was said to include (1) the value of the land taken; (2) any injury to the remaining part of the tract of land; (3) as an element in assessing damages for the taking of land, the adaptability of the land taken for a special purpose, affecting its value, must be taken into consideration; (4) damages to other lands of the landowner limited to the tract, a portion of which is taken, may extend to recovery for damages to the entire tract; (5) that the proper way to arrive at diminution in value of the remaining land of said tract is the difference in the market value just before and just after the taking."
And in the said case of Rudder v. Limestone County, supra, it was further said that the important question recurring for decision, is the
The summarization of the subject by Judge Freeman (Symonds v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
St. Clair County v. Bukacek
...31 So.2d 346; Coffee County v. Spurlin, 245 Ala. 99, 16 So.2d 12; Bates v. Chilton County, 244 Ala. 297, 13 So.2d 186; Pickens County v. Jordan, 239 Ala. 589, 196 So. 121; Conecuh County v. Carter, 220 Ala. 668, 126 So. 132; Rudder v. Limestone County, 220 Ala. 485, 125 So. 670, 68 A.L.R. W......
-
Alabama Power Co. v. Citizens of State
...the Alabama Constitution specifically provides for the Legislature to set the amount of just compensation. See Pickens County v. Jordan, 239 Ala. 589, 591, 196 So. 121, 123 (1940) (interpreting § 235 of the Alabama Constitution—which provides that compensation is "[t]o be ascertained as may......
-
Jefferson County v. Adwell
...249, 25 So. 220, 221. To like effect see Mobile & Ohio R. Co. v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co., 120 Ala. 21, 24 So. 408; Pickens County v. Jordan, 239 Ala. 589, 196 So. 121. But in none of the cases where the condemnation proceeding was instituted prior to the actual occupancy of the land, do ......
-
Alabama Power Co. v. Thompson
... ... 7 ALABAMA POWER CO. v. THOMPSON. 7 Div. 909.Supreme Court of AlabamaOctober 16, 1947 ... Range 10 East, all in Cleburne County ... The ... Alabama Power Company in ... 5, 6, 7, and 8. Under our decisions witnesses should ... Henson, 237 Ala. 561, 187 So ... 718; Pickens County v. Jordon, 239 Ala. 589, 196 So ... 121 ... ...