Pierre v. Connecticut

Decision Date12 June 2006
Docket NumberNo. 05-10733.,05-10733.
Citation126 S. Ct. 2873,165 L. Ed. 2d 904,547 U.S. 1197
PartiesPIERRE <I>v.</I> CONNECTICUT.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Certiorari denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
100 cases
  • Britton v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • October 16, 2018
    ...appeal. Our Supreme Court rejected Pierre's claim. State v. Pierre , 277 Conn. 42, 53–86, 890 A.2d 474, cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1197, 126 S.Ct. 2873, 165 L.Ed.2d 904 (2006). The second habeas court stated that it failed to see how a similar claim raised at the petitioner's first habeas trial......
  • State v. Zapata, No. 30426.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • March 9, 2010
    ...at trial, confrontation clause places no constraints on use of prior testimonial statements), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1197, 126 S.Ct. 2873, 165 L.Ed.2d 904 (2006); and State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 753, 513 A.2d 86 (prior written, inconsistent out-of-court statement of declarant, signed by......
  • State v. Cameron M.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • November 20, 2012
    ...namely, State v. Simpson, supra, 286 Conn. 634, and State v. Pierre, 277 Conn. 42, 890 A.2d 474, cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1197, 126 S. Ct. 2873, 165 L. Ed. 2d 904 (2006). We agree with the state and conclude that the victim was available at trial for cross-examinationas contemplated by Crawfo......
  • Skakel v. State Of Conn.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • April 20, 2010
    ...in murder was against declarant's penal interest because statement squarely implicated him in crime), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1197, 126 S. Ct. 2873, 165 L. Ed. 2d 904 (2006); State v. Rivera, 268 Conn. 351, 368, 844 A.2d 191 (2004) (declarant's "statement was squarely against [his] penal int......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Developments in Connecticut Criminal Law: 2007
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 82, 2008
    • Invalid date
    ...any federal constitutional claim was necessitated by the Supreme Court's 2006 decision in State v. Pierre, 277 Conn. 42, cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2873 (2006). The Stenner court noted that appropriate briefing and analysis using the factors set forth in State v. Geisler, 222 Conn. 672, 684-8......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT