Pierson v. Phillips
Decision Date | 17 December 1925 |
Docket Number | 2 Div. 882 |
Citation | 214 Ala. 88,106 So. 501 |
Parties | PIERSON v. PHILLIPS, Tax Collector. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County; S.F. Hobbs, Judge.
Bill in equity by W.T. Pierson against G.C. Phillips, as Tax Collector of Dallas County. From a decree sustaining demurrer to the bill, complainant appeals. Affirmed.
A.M Pitts and A.D. Pitts, both of Selma, for appellant.
Pettus Fuller & Lapsley, of Selma, for appellee.
Appellant filed the bill in this cause to enjoin the collection of a special school tax of one mill voted by the people of Dallas county in June of the current year. Some objections to the remedy sought were interposed by appellee in the trial court but they are not reiterated in the brief on appeal, and appear to have been settled in appellant's favor in Shanks v. Winkler, 210 Ala. 101, 97 So. 142.
The question of essential merit in the cause arises as follows:
Section 1 of article 19 of the Constitution, adopted in 1915 as an amendment of the Constitution of 1901 (Acts 1915, p. 107 et seq.), reads as follows:
"The several counties in the state shall have power to levy and collect a special county tax not exceeding thirty cents on each one hundred dollars worth of taxable property in such counties in addition to that now authorizd or that may hereafter be authorized for public school purposes, and in addition to that now authorized under section 260 of article 14 of the Constitution," with a proviso for popular approval in each county, not now involved.
Section 260 of the Constitution:
The levy of one mill voted by the people of Dallas county, the tax in question,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pullman Car & Mfg. Corporation of Alabama v. Hamilton
... ... adopted appear in other sections of the Constitution, as in ... section 260, and were adverted to by Mr. Justice Sayre in ... Pierson v. Phillips, Tax Collector, 214 Ala. 88, 106 ... [155 So. 618] and declared to mean property that is subject to be taxed ... The ... ...
- State v. Williams
-
Brittain v. Benefield
...constitutional violation in levying both the one mill tax and the three mill tax within the county for school purposes. Pierson v. Phillips, 214 Ala. 88, 106 So. 501. The result is that if there is any defect or irregularity in the election so far as the three mill tax is concerned, it lies......