Pies v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.

Decision Date14 August 1962
Docket NumberNo. 7087,7087
Citation1962 NMSC 104,374 P.2d 122,70 N.M. 361
PartiesJerome PIES, Claimant, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEKINS VAN AND STORAGE COMPANY, Inc., Employer, and Employees Mutual of Wausau, Insurer, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

Montoya & Shwartz, Albuquerque, for appellant.

Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, James C. Ritchie, Albuquerque, for appellees.

MOISE, Justice.

The issue in this case is identical with the one this day decided in Batte v. Stanley, Inc., N.Mex., 374 P.2d 124.

In that case the employer appealed from an allowance of 60% partial permanent disability where actual earnings showed at most a 17% reduction. We held that the amount of earnings was not conclusive as to earning ability or capacity, and that a judgment for a greater percentage of disability would be upheld if supported by proper findings based upon substantial evidence.

The instant case is an appeal by the employee from an allowance of 15% partial permanent disability where actual earnings showed a 30% reduction.

The rule announced in Batte is equally applicable here, and the result in this case must be the same as in that.

The court made the following pertinent findings touching on earning ability:

'2. That the Plaintiff worked for the Bekins Van and Storage Company, Inc. at an hourly wage of $1.52 per hour for approximately 10 hours per day or approximately $76.00 per week.

'5. Following the compensable accident of June 3, 1960 the plaintiff was temporarily totally disabled until September 3, 1960 or for approximately 13 weeks; was 50% temporarily partially disabled thereafter until December 3, 1960 for another approximate 13 weeks; and suffers a permanent partial disability of 15%.

'6. That the plaintiff has completed one year and one half year in general college.

'7. That the plaintiff has spent four years in the United States Navy as a hospital corpsman.

'8. The plaintiff has spent three or four months on a delivery route driving a paneled truck, at a weekly salary of approximately $50.00 per week.

'9. That the plaintiff worked as a part time helper at the Bekins Van and Storage Company, Inc. in Pasadena, California, doing heavy work at an hourly wage of $2.55 for approximately three months prior to his injury.

'10. That the defendant has worked at the Huntington Hospital in Pasadena, California, as an orderly.

'11. Immediately previous to obtaining the employment with the defendant-employer, the plaintiff had worked for the Equitable Audit Company out of San Carlos, California as a shopper earning $1.75 per hour, working on the average of 10 to 12 hours per day and 6 days a week. He held this employment approximately 2 to 3 months. In his work as a shopper, the plaintiff would go to various businesses to purchase merchandise and observe the employees of various business concerns to find out how they handled their sales and accounted for the moneys they received from the sales. No lifting was required in this work.

'12. That the plaintiff, at the time of trial was and is presently employed in Phoenix, Arizona in a General Hospital as an orderly and manages to keep from doing heavy work although the employment requires it at times and plaintiff earns a weekly wage of approximately $55.00.

'13. That the plaintiff had, as of December 3, 1960 and as of the time of trial, an earning capacity or an ability to earn an average weekly wage of $64.60, the equivalent of a permanent partial disability of 15%.'

It is apparent that the facts found of $50.00 per week earnings, or $53.00 per week earnings would support a finding of 30% disability, under the formula of Sec. 59-10-18.3, N.M.S.A.1953, the earnings at time of the injury having been $76.00. However, in finding No. 13 earning capacity, as distinguished from earnings, is found to be $64.60...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State v. Rhodes, 8225
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of New Mexico
    • 13 mars 1967
    ...... Faubion v. Tucker, 58 N.M. 303, 270 P.2d 713; Gore v. Cone, 60 N.M. 29, 287 P.2d 229; Pies v. Bekins Van & Storage Co., 70 N.M. 361, 374 P.2d 122.         Appellant argues his points ......
  • Brownlee v. Lincoln County Livestock Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of New Mexico
    • 28 mars 1966
    ...of full wages following injury is not conclusive on the question of earning ability, Batte v. Stanley's supra; Pies v. Bekins Van and Storage Co., 1962, 70 N.M. 361, 374 P.2d 122, it may be indicative, Breland v. Ceco Steel Products Corp., 1962, 173 Neb. 354, 113 N.W.2d 528; and 2 Larson's ......
  • Flores v. Federici
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of New Mexico
    • 16 août 1962
  • Rayburn v. Boys Super Market, Inc.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of New Mexico
    • 17 août 1964
    ...v. Roberson Construction Co., 70 N.M. 187, 372 P.2d 381; Batte v. Stanley's, 70 N.M. 364, 374 P.2d 124, or Pies v. Bekins Van and Storage Company, 70 N.M. 361, 374 P.2d 122. Since it is conceded that the period of disability could not have exceeded 19 weeks, the total amount of the employer......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT