Pillen v. Workmen's Comp. Bureau
Decision Date | 23 February 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 5851.,5851. |
Citation | 60 N.D. 465,235 N.W. 354 |
Parties | PILLEN v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BUREAU. |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.
An employee under contract to work for 60 cents per hour and $2.50 per day for living expenses, who is injured on a public street en route to a hotel to get his lunch during the noon hour, and while riding on a truck by invitation of the truck driver, who also worked for the same employer, and where it does not appear that the employer had any control or authority over the public street where the accident happened, the injury was not received in the course of employment, even though the route taken was the direct and only route taken by all the employees going to and from the plant where such employees worked.
Appeal from District Court, Mercer County; H. L. Berry, Judge.
Action by Mrs. Mathew Pillen against the Workmen's Compensation Bureau of the State to review a decision denying plaintiff's claim for compensation for the death of her husband, Mathew Pillen, while in the employ of the Fuel Economy Engineering Company.Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Reversed, and case ordered dismissed.
Thos. J. Burke, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Charles L. Crum and Scott Cameron, both of Bismarck, for respondent.
At the time of the accident in this case, the Hughes Electric Company was building the new power plant immediately east of, and at the end of, the main street in Beulah, N. D.The property was entirely inclosed with a fence.The main street of Beulah extends right down to the gate in the fence through which employees and persons having business with the Hughes Electric Company or the Fuel Economy Engineering Company pass.The power plant is back about three hundred feet east of the gate.About three blocks west of the gate the general traveling public not having business with the Hughes Electric Light Company or the Fuel Economy EngineeringCompany turned south and went around the plant, and while the main street extended to the gate and the property on either side of the street was not owned by the Hughes Electric Light Company, the principal traffic on the end of the street was by employees, and persons having business with the Hughes Electric Light Company and the Fuel Economy Engineering Company.
Prior to the accident Mathew Pillen, a mechanic, was employed by the said Hughes Electric Light Company, and during a part of that time the Fuel Economy Engineering Company was also employed by the Hughes Electric Light Company in the installation of machinery in the plant.On the 6th day of August 1927, Pillen's employment with the Hughes Electric Company terminated, and he was employed by the Fuel Economy Engineering Company to assist in the installation of the machinery.He began working for the Fuel Economy Engineering Company on the 7th day of August, 1927, and on the 8th day of August, 1927, in going to his luncheon at noon he fell from a truck driven by an employee of the Fuel Economy Engineering Company, receiving injuries from which he died.
His widow filed a claim with the Compensation Bureau, and after a hearing thereon, the claim was denied upon the ground that the injury was not received in the course of employment; thereafter, this action was brought in the district court, findings of fact and conclusions of law were made by the trial judge favorable to the plaintiff, and from a judgment thereon the defendant appeals.
The sole question involved is: Was Pillen injured in the course of his employment?The evidence relating to his employment and the accident is, in substance, as follows: Witness Samuel Helvik testified:
“I was employed by the Hughes Electric Company, building a new power plant at Beulah, installing boilers, tubulars and condensers.The Fuel Economy Engineering Company was a subcontractor for steel work and was doing a part of the work under an independent contract.I employed Matt Pillen to work for the Hughes Electric Company.We furnished him transportation from Bismarck to Beulah and back, and we also paid his hotel bill at Beulah, for sleeping quarters and meals, and so much per hour.I think around sixty cents per hour.He worked about two weeks and then went to work for the Fuel Economy Engineering Company.Mr. Delaney was the foreman of that company and I mentioned to Mr. Delaney what I was paying and also the agreement I had with Mr. Pillen for board and room.At the time Pillen came to Beulah he stopped at the same hotel I did and where all the rest of the men working for the company (Hughes Electric Light Company) were staying and the same were ordered to stay.The bills for expenses for the Hughes Electric Company were all billed direct to the Hughes Electric Company of Bismarck by the hotel manager.
Ques.Have you any knowledge about the bills of the Fuel Economy Engineering Company?Ans.I could not say.There is another hotel and some of the employees of the Fuel Economy Engineering Company were staying in private houses.I don't know how the board and room of the Fuel Economy Engineering Company was paid for, and I don't know whether they asked them to live in a certain place.”
Thomas W. Delaney testified:
Mr. Johnson testified:
Gerhard Helvik testified:
Ralph Sanders testified:
From this testimony it is clear that neither the Hughes Electric Light Company nor the Fuel Economy Engineering Company had any contract with Mr. Pillen to transport him from the hotel to the plant, or the plant to the hotel.During the time that he worked for the Hughes Electric Light Plant under Mr. Helvick, Johnson, who was in the employ of the Fuel Economy Engineering Company, frequently invited him to ride on his truck in going to and from the hotel.There is no evidence that Pillen rode with Johnson after he was employed by the Fuel Economy Engineering Company, except on the day of the accident, and it appears from the testimony of Johnson that Pillen had started to walk to the hotel, for Johnson testified: “I was waiting for Tom Delaney and I hollered to Pillen ‘Dad come back and ride with me.”’Delaney was delayed and they started for the hotel without him, Pillen sitting on the end gate, which was apparently lying flat, level with the floor of the truck and held by...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
- Pillen v. The Workmen's Compensation Bureau of State
-
Horn v. Sandhill Furniture Co.
...Medicinal Spirits Corp., 272 Ky. 588, 114 S.W.2d 1115; Ohrmund v. Industrial Comm., 211 Wis. 153, 246 N.W. 589; Pillen v. Workmen's Comp. Bureau, 60 N.D. 465, 235 N.W. 354; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Industrial Comm., 100 Utah 8, 110 P.2d 334; Mitchell v. Ball Bros. Co., 97 Ind.App. 642,......
-
Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
...and reference is made to certain evidence which it is said may be found in the transcript of the proceedings had upon the trial of the Pillen case. Obviously, the effect and scope of the in any given case as precedent is measured by the terms of the decision itself. Where a rule of law is a......
-
Shoemaker v. Snow Crop Marketers Division of Clinton Foods
...incidental to and in furtherance of the employment was present--the employee merely was going for his lunch. Pillen v. Workmen's Comp. Board, 60 N.D. 465, 235 N.W. 354, applied the Taylor case, and incidentally Walker v. Hyde, 43 Idaho 625, 253 P. 1104, because therein likewise no special i......