Pino v. Landon
| Docket Number | SCDB 1954-096,333. |
| Decision Date | 11 April 1955 |
| Citation | 349 U.S. 901,99 L. Ed. 2d 1239,75 S. Ct. 576,1955 U.S. LEXIS 944 |
| Parties | PINO v. LANDON, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 870, to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
On the record here we are unable to say that the conviction has attained such finality as to support an order of deportation within the contemplation of § 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The judgment is reversed.
Reuben Goodman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Paul T. Smith and Jacob Spiegel.
John F. Davis argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard J. Blanchard.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 books & journal articles
-
What Did Mork Say to Mindy When He Forgot to Register? Pannu, Pannu! What Pannu v. Holder Reveals About Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude and Failure-to-register Statutes
...and its common usage classification); Pino v. Nucolls, 215 F.2d 237, 245 (1st Cir. 1954), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 (1955) (same); Nicanor-Romero v. Mukasey, 523 F.3d 992, 1004-05 (9th Cir. 2008) (suggesting that whether "moral turpitude necessarily inhere......
-
How Crime-based Deportations Undermine State Sovereignty and Community Rehabilitation
...explicitly defined convictions. In 1955, the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue in a perfunctory manner in Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 (1955). The conviction at issue was from Maryland, and was issued under a procedure that allowed a sentence to be "revoked" and to be put "on ......
-
Tcl - Immigration Consequences of Criminal Pleas and Convictions - October 2006 - Immigration Law - a Primer
...F.2d 757 (2d Cir. 1933). 17. INA § 240(c)(3)(A); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(3)(A); Matter of Mena, 7 I&N Dec. 30 (BIA 1979). 18. Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 (1955). 19. Matter of Thomas, Int. Dec. 3245 (BIA 1995). 20. Matter of Espinoza, 15 I&N Dec. 328 (BIA 1975). 21. Pozo, supra note 1 at 526. ......
-
Tcl - Cle Questions, Answers, and Cle Affidavit - October 2006 - Earn Cle Credit
...may be considered criminal in nature. A conviction that is on direct appeal is not final for immigration purposes. [Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 (1955).] 5. c: Possession of drug paraphernalia is a removable offense. [Luu-Le v. INS, 224 F.3d 911, 914 (9th Cir. 2000).] Even though a single o......
Request a trial to view additional results