Pinson v. Coleman

Decision Date30 March 2023
Docket NumberCivil Action 14-416
PartiesPIERRE PINSON, Petitioner, v. BRIAN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.
CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania

Lisa Pupo Lenihan, Magistrate Judge

OPINION

Joy Flowers Conti, Senior United States District Court Judge

I. Introduction

Presently before the court is a motion for relief from judgment filed by petitioner Pierre Pinson (“Pinson” or petitioner) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). (ECF No. 40.) The motion was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court.

On August 29, 2022, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) wherein she recommended that Pinson's motion be denied and that a certificate of appealability also be denied. (ECF No. 44.) On October 19, 2022, Pinson filed a motion requesting proper development of the record (ECF No. 47). The court construes the motion requesting proper development of record as objections to a portion of the R&R.

On October 19, 2022, Pinson also filed a motion for court order to unseal records and order the Commonwealth to turn over all internal affairs records with respect to detective Dennis Logan. (ECF No. 48.) On November 10, 2022, Pinson filed an “addendum” to his “original filing.” (ECF No. 49.) On November 29, 2022, Pinson filed a motion to withdraw the addendum. (ECF No. 50.) On December 1, 2022 Pinson filed a motion for subpoena duces tecum. (ECF No. 51.)

For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the R&R will be adopted in part; Pinson's objections will be overruled; Pinson's Rule 60(b) motion will be denied for the reasons set forth in the R&R, as modified and supplemented by this opinion; the motion for court order to unseal records and order the Commonwealth to turn over all internal affairs records with respect to detective Dennis Logan (ECF No. 48) and motion for subpoena duces tecum (ECF No. 51) will be denied; and the motion to withdraw addendum (ECF No. 49) will be granted.

II. Procedural History and Background

On October 21, 1999, Pinson was charged in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with four counts of attempted homicide, four counts of aggravated assault, one count of criminal conspiracy and one count of carrying a firearm without a license. See Commonwealth v. Pinson, CP-02-CR-0013750-1999 (Allegheny Cty. Common Pleas Ct.). The charges stemmed from an incident in which shots were fired into a police station on August 27, 1999. A jury trial commenced on July 19, 2000. The jury found Pinson guilty of four counts of aggravated assault, one count of criminal conspiracy, and one count of carrying a firearm without a license. Pinson was acquitted of the four counts of attempted homicide. The court sentenced Pinson to an aggregate prison term of 35 to 90 years. Pinson took a direct appeal of his conviction, which was not successful. Pinson filed three petitions pursuant to Pennsylvania's Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 PA. CONS. STAT. § 9541. The third PCRA appeal ended on February 26, 2014. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania summarized the evidence produced at Pinson's trial at CP-02-CR-0013750-1999 as follows:

The evidence presented at trial established that on August 27, 1999, Pittsburgh Police Officers Stephen Mescan, Michael Boyd, Darlene Gardner and Tracy Carson were at work in the Zone 6 Police Station on Northumberland Street in the Squirrel Hill section of the City of Pittsburgh. At approximately 3:00 a.m., numerous shots were fired at the police station. Bullets entered through the primarily wood and glass building front. Officers dove for cover and turned off lights so they would not be seen. Two officers stated that they could hear the “whiz” of a bullet passing right by their heads. One bullet struck Officer Steph[e]n Mescan in the foot. Witnesses could not definitively say the actual number of shots fired at the station, but there were (5) five holes in the front of the police station, and at least six shots fired into vehicles parked directly in front of the station. Casings and slugs were found in the street in front of the station, and there were bullet holes on the walls inside. Ballistics tests showed that the weapons used in the shooting were a 9 mm and a .45 caliber automatic.
Zhen Dong Ling, a delivery driver for the New York Times, was driving on Northumberland Street approximately two (2) blocks from the police station when he heard five to six “pops” like a firecracker. Then a vehicle drove past him, coming from the direction of the police station at a high rate of speed. The vehicle was a dark sports utility vehicle which looked like a Jeep, possibly black or dark green. Mr. Ling could not see the occupant or occupants in the vehicle.
A few hours later, Megan Siegal awoke to find that her Black Jeep Cherokee had been stolen. Ms. Siegal, who lived five (5) blocks from the Zone 6 police station, had last seen her vehicle parked outside at approximately 11:00 p.m. on August 26, 1999. When she awoke to find the Jeep gone, she called police and reported [it] stolen. She received a call around 4:30 p.m. on August 27, 1999, from police informing her that her vehicle had been recovered in a post office parking lot in the East Liberty section of the City of Pittsburgh. Postal workers had called to report that a black Jeep Grand Cherokee had been left in the lot all day with its engine running. One postal worker had noticed the Jeep parked in the lot when he arrived for work at 5:45 a.m. Ms. Siegal met a police officer in the post office parking lot and confirmed that it was her vehicle. However, Mrs. Siegal noticed that there was a plastic Snapple brand iced tea bottle that did not belong to her, and there were bullet casings in the vehicle. Also, someone had written on the headliner (felt covering of the roof inside the vehicle) in the front seat area, writing which had not been there the night before when she left her car in her parking space. The writing on the headliner on the drivers side was “thank you.” The writing on the passenger side headliner was “Fucc the Piggz”, spelled and written in a very distinctive manner.
Ballistics test later showed that the casings found inside Ms. Siegal's Jeep matched those found at the scene of the Zone 6 shooting.
During the investigation police received information that [Pinson] and his codefendant had perpetrated the shooting at the Zone 6 police station. Acting upon the information, police detectives visited Pinson's codefendant, Ricky Boyer, approximately two (2) weeks after the incident. Boyer agreed to be interviewed at the detective's office and, after waiving his rights, confessed to the shooting, as well as other crimes. Boyer detailed his involvement, as well as that of [Pinson.] An arrest warrant was issued for [Pinson] and he was taken into custody on September 19, 1999. He was interviewed by detectives after he waived his rights and signed a preinterrogation warning form. [Pinson] then confessed to his involvement in the shooting, as well as the other crimes he committed with Boyer.
Pinson confessed to being a passenger in the stolen jeep during the shooting. Several witnesses testified to seeing a similar, dark colored jeep near the scene of the crime. Pinson also admitted firing shots at the police station from a .45 caliber weapon (the same caliber as the shell casings found at the scene), and writing “FUCC THE PIGGZ” (the same language used in his tattoo) on the headliner of the stolen jeep. In addition, various drawings were recovered from Pinson's cell in which he stylized the words “FUC” and “THE PIGZ.” The confession, along with the eyewitnesses' statements, and the physical evidence recovered from the scene, constituted overwhelming evidence of Pinson's guilt.

(ECF No. 9-6 at 2-4, 17-18.)

On October 27, 1999, Pinson was charged in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas with three counts of robbery, two counts of criminal conspiracy and one count of attempted robbery. The charges stemmed from Pinson's attempted robbery and actual robbery of a QwiCash store. See Commonwealth v. Pinson, CP-02-CR-0014157-1999 (Allegheny Cty. Common Pleas Ct.). A jury trial commenced on July 26, 2000. The jury convicted Pinson of all counts. The court sentenced Pinson to an aggregate prison term of 15 to 60 years, which he was ordered to serve consecutively to the sentence imposed at CP-02-CR-0013750-1999, which is detailed above. Pinson filed a direct appeal of his conviction and sentence and a PCRA petition. The PCRA petition at this case number was the same as the third PCRA petition filed at CP-02-CR-0013750-1999. His PCRA appeal ended on February 26, 2014. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania summarized the evidence presented at Pinson's trial at CP-02-CR-0014157-1999 as follows:

Terry Williams was the manager of a QwiCash store. The store provided money services such as check cashing and Western Union Moneygrams. On August 30, 1999, Mr. Williams witnessed two men wearing bandanas attempting to break into the QwiCash before normal business hours. Mr. Williams fled to the back of the store and called 911. The two men were unable to gain entry to the store at that time. The following day, Pinson and his accomplice, Ricky Boyer, entered the store during business hours. Boyer began firing a silver handgun at the security windows inside the store which separated the customers from the employees. Witnesses testified they saw Pinson brandishing a black handgun during the robbery. It is unclear, however, whether Pinson actually fired his weapon. One customer, Bridget Ways, was caught in the melee. She dropped her money on the floor during the
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT