Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-800-335-6202

Pisciotta v. Mahoney-Troast Const. Co., MAHONEY-TROAST

Document Cited authorities 1 Cited in 1 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Decision Date25 September 1950
Docket NumberMAHONEY-TROAST
Citation5 N.J. 350,75 A.2d 764
PartiesLouis PISCIOTTA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Petitioner.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Page 350

5 N.J. 350

75 A.2d 764

Louis PISCIOTTA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MAHONEY-TROAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Sept. 25, 1950.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.

See same case below, 8 N.J.Super. 213, 73 A.2d 743.

Duggan, Shaw & Hughes, Newark, for the petitioner.

John W. McGeehan, Jr., and O'Brien, Brett & O'Brien, all of Newark, for the respondent.

Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Margolies v. Crawford Clothes, A--134
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • February 16, 1953
    ...Powder Works, supra; Pisciotta v. Mahoney-Troast Const. Co., 8 N.J.Super. 213, 73 A.2d 743 (App.Div.1950), certification denied 5 N.J. 350, 75 A.2d 764 (1950). The judgment of the County Court is reversed and that of the Workmen's Compensation Division is ...
  • Vadurro v. Yellow Cab Co. of Camden
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • September 25, 1950

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT