Pitcairn v. Philip Hiss Co.

Decision Date08 October 1903
Citation125 F. 110
PartiesPITCAIRN v. PHILIP HISS CO.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Clarence Burleigh and W. W. Smith, for plaintiff in error.

Wm. M Hall, Jr., for defendant in error.

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

The contract on which the plaintiffs brought suit was made out by the following written proposals and acceptances:

'January 28th, 1899.
'Mrs. Robert Pitcairn, Pittsburgh, Pa. Dear Madam-- Below please find our estimate for the complete decoration of walls and ceilings of your main, first, second and third halls.
'The protecting and cleaning of the floors and woodwork is included. The ceilings to be gilded in dull gold and overlaid with a carefully designed ornament of appropriate style, in rich Italian colors. The walls to be of rich red damask pattern, painted and glazed on canvas. The decoration of the vestibule is also included.
'We will do the above work in the most artistic and workmanlike manner for the sum of sixty-five hundred ($6,500.00) dollars.
'We also propose to repaint and regild the reception room ceiling for the sum of three hundred ($300.00) dollars. Very respectfully submitted,

The Philip Hiss Company, Per Philip Hiss, Prest.'

'Accepted by Mrs. Robert Pitcairn.

'January 28th, 1899.
'Mrs. Robert Pitcairn, Pittsburgh, Pa. Dear Madam:-- We propose to recover, re-gimp and re-fringe two (2) sofas and five (5) chairs, in your lower hall, using moleskin mohair velvet in combination with your tapestries, for the sum of six hundred and twenty-five ($625.00) dollars.
'Also the sofa and two (2) chairs in second hall in moleskin mohair velvet for the sum of two hundred and fifty ($250.00) dollars.
'We will also re-make and re-line five and one-half (5 1/2) pairs of portiers with moleskin mohair velvet, using your tapestry borders, for the sum of eight hundred and twenty-five dollars $825.00. All this work to be done in the best manner. Very respectfully submitted,

The Philip Hiss Company, Per Philip Hiss, Prest.'

'Accepted by Mrs. Robert Pitcairn.

"January 28th, 1899. "Mrs. Robert Pitcairn, Pittsburgh, Pa. Dear Madam:--We propose to make one fine Aubusson carpet for room over dining room,for the sum of seventeen hundred and seventy dollars $1,770.00 "Also for halls of English handwoven rugs-- No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 ........................................... 2,425.00 No. 6, 7, and 8 ................................................. 1,382.00 Stairs and landings ................................................ 2,233.00 -------------------- Total, including designing and laying, seventy-eight hundred dollars ..................................................... $7,800.00 "Respectfully submitted, "Accepted by The Philip Hiss Company, "Mrs. Robert Pitcairn. Per Philip Hiss, Prest." "July 14, 1899. "Mrs. Robert Pitcairn. Dear Madam: We will refinish, reupholster and cover in Aubusson tapestries thirty present chairs and make four new chairs to match ..................................................... $5,000.00 1 rug, plain center, hand woven .................................... 2,900.00 "Yours very truly, "Accepted by The Philip Hiss Co., "Mrs. Robert Pitcairn. Philip Hiss, President."
'Mrs. Robert Pitcairn. Dear Madam: Below please find estimate of work at your house.
'Office. Building the extension to third floor, including two bath rooms (in one of which the old fittings are to be used), also light to be introduced by side window into pantry under office. New part of office to have wood work and wall coverings in accord with old part, color of wall stuff to be selected. New rug, sofa re-covered in velour, 2 new easy chairs in velour, 2 old leather desk chairs in hand woven tapestry, curtains for doors and windows, cost to be $8,550.00.
'Library. Ceiling repainted, walls covered in hard brocatelle, wood work refinished, caps of doors and windows made less heavy, ends of ceiling wood work refitted, new curtains and portiers of Genoaese velour, furniture recovered in same, 1 large and 2 small rugs, cost to be $7,975.00.
'Billiard Room. Ceiling and walls redecorated, tops of windows lowered, new mantel of old wood, wood work cleaned and finished, curtains of material to be selected, furniture recovered of leather of quality of present leather in new design, cost to be $4,500.00.
'Son's Room. Walls and ceilings redecorated, furniture recovered and curtains, new rug, wood work cleaned, cost to be $2,200.00.

'Daughter's Room. Walls and ceilings redecorated, wood work and mantel (shutters not included) of maple (bird's eye panels), curtains and furniture covers of damask selected, new rug, 2 bureaus, 1 bed (5'6') and bedding, 1 easy chair, 1 rocker, 2 small chairs, 1 work table (3x2) of bird's eye maple, cost to be $5,200.00.

Summary,
Office, baths, &c............................................... $ 8,550.00
Library .......................................................... 7,975.00
Billiard room .................................................... 4,500.00
Son's room ....................................................... 2,200.00
Daughter's room .................................................. 5,200.00
Refinishing wood and floors of halls, all bed rooms (not over), about ................................................... 2,000.00
Putting shutters and wood work in order, not over 1,000.00
----------
$31,425.00

"An allowance of $1,500.00 for plumbing and tiles is included in

above estimate.

"No wiring or heating work included. Very truly,

"Accepted: The Philip Hiss Co.,

"Robert Pitcairn. Per Philip Hiss, President.

"September 14, 1899."

The defendant contended that the work was to be done to the satisfaction of his wife, and testified as follows: 'Q. What was the conversation you had with Mr. iss at the time you signed this contract (referring to the $31,000 proposal which he had accepted)? A. The chief point in the conversation was that he, as well as everybody, knows that I did not intend to that business for my house; that it was entirely in the hands of Mrs. Pitcairn, and had been for over 40 years. Q. Well, was there anything said about this contract or your liability under the contract at that time? A. I declined to have anything to do with the matter, when he told me that he had come to see me at the special request of Mrs. Pitcairn, who would be very much pleased, on account of the size or amount, if I would sign it. I told him that I did not want to sign it or have much to do with the matter on account of my experience; that I was very much afraid it would be too much for Mrs. Pitcairn, but that my whole desire was to please her. Mr. Hiss distinctly stated that that was his desire, and he knew he could please her, and would please her, and desired to be distinctly understood that if he did not please her he would make no charge. Q. Did you have that distinct understanding with him immediately before you signed this contract? A. He reiterated that, and plead with me, on account of Mrs. Pitcairn, and I, on a sudden impulse, 'On that condition,' I said, 'I will sign it,' and signed it.'

Mrs Pitcairn also testified to a similar effect in regard to the acceptances signed by her: 'Q. What statement, if any, Mrs. Pitcairn, was made to you by Mr. Hiss as to how this work was to be done in your house? A. When Mr. Hiss presented the design or sketch or suggestion to me I rather hesitated, and he said: 'Mrs. Pitcairn, if you will allow me to do this work, I will do it to your entire satisfaction; otherwise you will not be required to pay for it or accept it.' ' And Mrs. Pitcairn is also corroborated in this by Mrs. Reese, a niece, who lived in the house: 'Q. Did you hear the conversation between Mr. Hiss and Mrs. Pitcairn shortly before these contracts were signed? A. I did....

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • Seal Oil Co. v. Roberson
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • October 15, 1935
    ...Co., 23 Okla. 386, 100 P. 524; Reed v. Moore, 54 Okla. 354, 154 P. 348; Higgs v. DeMaziroff, 263 N.Y. 473, 189 N.E. 555; Pitcairn v. Philip Hiss Co., 125 F. 110; Watkins Salt Co. v. Mulkey, 225 F. 739; Mears v. Smith, 199 Mass. 319, 85 N.E. 165; Edward Thompson Co. v. Foster, 101 Kan. 14, 1......
  • Bauer v. Monroe
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • May 4, 1945
    ...Mass. 483, 156 N.E. 37; Martin v. Jablonski, 253 Mass. 451, 149 N.E. 156; Fogler v. Purkiser, 127 Cal.App. 554, 16 P.2d 305. In Pitcairn v. Philip Hiss Co., supra , court said: 'According to the modern and better view, the rule which prohibits the modification of a written contract by parol......
  • American Crystal Sugar Co. v. Nicholas
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • December 17, 1941
    ...called American. 3 Wigmore on Evidence, 3d Ed., Vol. 9, § 2400; Ruppert v. Singhi, 243 N. Y. 156, 153 N.E. 33, 34; Pitcairn v. Philip Hiss Co., 3 Cir., 125 F. 110, 113. 4 Indianapolis Glove Co. v. United States, 7 Cir., 96 F.2d 816, 819; Schneider v. Duffy, D.C.N.J., 43 F.2d 642, 648; Valde......
  • Bauer v. Monroe
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • May 4, 1945
    ...cannot be considered by the court, trial or appellate. Gore v. Bingaman, 29 Cal.App.2d 460, 85 P.2d 172, 181. See also Pitcairn v. Philip Hiss Co., 3 Cir., 125 F. 110;Bushnell v. Elkins, 34 Wyo. 495, 245 P. 304, 51 A.L.R. 13;Cockrell v. Martin, 124 Okl. 284, 255 P. 1101;Mears v. Smith, 199 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT