Pitts v. State, II-203
| Decision Date | 03 March 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. II-203,II-203 |
| Citation | Pitts v. State, 355 So.2d 505 (Fla. App. 1978) |
| Parties | Willie Clifford PITTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Willie Clifford Pitts, in pro. per.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Patti Englander and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Appellant seeks review of the order denying his Motion to Vacate Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. We find no error and therefore affirm.
The appellant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to forty (40) years imprisonment on December 3, 1969. The appellant has previously taken a full appeal from this judgment and sentence. Pitts v. State, 244 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). The issue raised in the appellant's Motion to Vacate was previously raised and considered on direct appeal. Therefore, such issue may not be considered as grounds for post-conviction relief. Gore v. State, 260 So.2d 218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). The order appealed from is AFFIRMED.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Walcott v. State
...3d DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 364 So.2d 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Tyner v. State, 363 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Pitts v. State, 355 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Burau v. State, 353 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Ashley v. State, 350 So.2d 839 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Austin v. State, 1......
-
Mintlow v. State, 79-1578
...1st DCA 1977); Jackson v. State, 353 So.2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Thornton v. State, 354 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Pitts v. State, 355 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). ...
-
Duhart v. State, 80-533
...is now foreclosed in the state courts, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850; Epps v. State, 365 So.2d 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Pitts v. State, 355 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); and apparently the federal courts as well, Kastenbaum v. United States, 588 F.2d 138 (5th Cir. Affirmed. ...
-
Merrill v. State
...This matter was raised on his previous appeal and thus does not set forth a proper ground for post-conviction relief. Pitts v. State, 355 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The allegations concerning jury instructions attempt to raise matters which properly should have been raised on direct app......