Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago And St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck

Decision Date09 March 1909
Docket Number21,407
Citation87 N.E. 644,172 Ind. 19
PartiesPittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company v. Peck
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From Cass Circuit Court; Joseph M. Rabb, Special Judge.

Action by Charles M. Peck against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. (See same case on former appeal-- 165 Ind. 537.) From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $ 4,000, defendant appeals. Transferred from the Appellate Court under § 1397 Burns 1908, Acts 1901, p. 565, § 13 (see 43 Ind.App. 316). Transferred to the Appellate Court. (Transferred again to the Supreme Court [see 44 Ind.App. 62]. Transferred again to the Appellate Court [see 172 Ind. 562]. Transferred again to the Supreme Court [see 44 Ind.App. ].

Transferred to the Appellate Court.

George E. Ross, for appellant.

Kistler & Kistler, for appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The constitutional validity of section one of the employers' liability act (Acts 1893, p. 294, § 8017 Burns 1908) has been firmly settled by the Supreme Court of this State and also by the Supreme Court of the United States. The assertion of appellant's counsel that this section is unconstitutional will not serve to lodge the jurisdiction over this appeal in the Supreme Court, which, otherwise, would be in the Appellate Court. It is therefore ordered that this cause be transferred to the Appellate Court. See Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Rogers (1907), 168 Ind. 483, 81 N.E. 212.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • State ex rel. Goodwine v. Cadwallader
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 11 Marzo 1909
    ... ... Appellee relies on the ... case of Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Walton ... (1905), 165 Ind ... 94, 83 N.E. 710, and cases cited; Pittsburgh, ... etc., R. Co. v. Mahoney (1897), 148 Ind ... ...
  • Richey v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago And St. Louis Railway Company
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 15 Febrero 1911
    ... ... constitutional question is raised, it cannot be regarded as ... presented for decision, and the jurisdiction is in this ... court. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Rogers ... (1907), 168 Ind. 483, 81 N.E. 212; Pittsburgh, etc., R ... Co. v. Peck (1909), 172 Ind. 19, 87 N.E. 644 ... ...
  • Richey v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 15 Febrero 1911
    ...decision, and the jurisdiction is in this court. Pittsburgh, etc., Ry. Co. v. Rogers, 168 Ind. 483, 81 N. E. 212;Pittsburgh, etc., Ry. Co. v. Peck, 172 Ind. 19, 87 N. E. 644. Where a case is so transferred, we presume that this court is expected either to ignore the constitutional question ......
  • Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company v. Peck
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 4 Junio 1909
    ...for plaintiff for $ 4,000, defendant appeals. Transferred to Supreme Court (see 43 Ind.App. 316). Transferred to Appellate Court (see 172 Ind. 19). Retransferred to Supreme Court. (Retransferred to Court [see 172 Ind. 562]. Retransferred to the Supreme Court [see 45 Ind.App. -- ]. Dismissed......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT