Pittsburgh v. Backus
Decision Date | 18 February 1893 |
Citation | 133 Ind. 625,33 N.E. 432 |
Parties | PITTSBURGH, C., C. & ST. L. RY. CO. v. BACKUS, County Treasurer, et al. |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, Marion county; Edgar A. Brown, Judge.
Action by the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company to enjoin Victor M. Backus, treasurer of Marion county, and others, from collecting taxes assessed against plaintiff railway company by the state board of tax commissioners. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.Butler, Snow & Butler, S. O. Pickens, S. Stansifer, and J. L. Rupe, for appellant.
This is a suit brought by the appellant against the appellees to enjoin the collection of taxes assessed against the appellant railway company by the state board of tax commissioners of Indiana. The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and is, and has been for several years, engaged in the business of a common carrier of freight and passengers, and in operating a system of railroads in the states of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, having various lines of railroads in Indiana; and its railroad track and rolling stock was assessed for taxation by the said state board of tax commissioners, under the act of the legislature of Indiana approved March 6, 1891.
The principal question involved in this case relates to the constitutionality and validity of the law under which the appellant's property was assessed, but some other questions are presented by the record, which we will consider later on. The act makes provision for the assessment of real and personal property by township and county assessors, creates a county board of equalization in each county in the state, and section 114 gives to such county boards “power to hear complaints of any owner of personal property except railroad tracks and rolling stock of railroads, to equalize the valuation of property and taxables;” and provides that “it shall pass upon each valuation, and may, on sufficient cause being shown, or on its own motion, correct the assessment or valuation of any property in such manner as will, in its judgment, make the valuation thereof just and equal, and provides that appeals shall lie from the decision of any county board of review to the state board of tax commissioners, which shall hear and determine the same in such manner as it may, by its rules, prescribe, and certify its decisions, which shall be final, to the proper county auditor.”
In relation to the assessment of railway property the act provides, (section 77:)
Section 78. “Such right of way, including the superstructures, main, side, or second track and terminals, turntable, telegraph poles, wires, instruments, and other appliances, and stations and improvements of the railroad company on such right of way, (excepting machinery, stationary engines, and other fixtures, which shall be considered personal property,) shall be held to be real estate for the purpose of taxation, and denominated ‘railroad track,’ and shall be so listed and valued,” etc.
Section 79 declares that the railroad track shall be listed and taxed in the several counties, etc.
Section 80 declares that
Section 81 provides for the taxation of tools, materials for repairs, etc., in the county, township, city, or town where the same may be on the 1st day of April of each year; and section 82 provides for the taxation of all real estate of any railroad other than that denominated “railroad track” and improvements thereon as lands and lots in the county, township, city, or town where situated.
Section 83 declares that between the 1st day of April and the 1st day of June of each year Second. Such list shall also contain a full and correct inventory of all other personal property of such railroad company not specifically taxed, including tools, etc., where the same may be on the 1st day of April. The third subdivision provides for an inventory of real estate other than that denominated “railroad track.”
Section 84 makes it the duty of county auditors to return to the proper assessors a copy of the lists as contained in the second and third specifications to be assessed by such assessors, the same to be treated in all respects in regard to assessments and equalization as other similar property belonging to individuals.
Section 85 reads as follows:
Section 86 subjects the persons, companies, and corporations to a penalty for failure to file such reports.
Section 87 reads as follows: “The auditor of state shall annually, on the meeting of the state board of tax commissioners, lay before said board the statements and schedules herein required to be returned to him, and said board shall assess such property in the manner...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chi. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. State
... ... Louis Railway Co. v. Backus, Treasurer, etc., 154 U. S. 439, 14 Sup. Ct. 1122, 38 L. Ed. 1041, the rule of property taxation is that the property is the basis of taxation. It ... 428, 87 N. W. 153;State ex rel. Morton et al. v. Back et al. (Neb.) 100 N. W. 952, 69 L. R. A. 447;State, etc., v. Severance, 55 Mo. 378;Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, etc., Railway Co. v. Backus, 133 Ind. 625, 33 N. E. 432;Baltimore & Ohio Railway Co. v. Koontz, 77 Va. 698;S. V. R. R. Co. v ... ...
-
State ex rel. Miller v. Leech
... ... Co. v. Wright County, ... 67 Iowa 199, 25 N.W. 128; Sterling Gas Co. v. Higby, ... 134 Ill. 557, 25 N.E. 660; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R ... Co. v. Backus, 133 Ind. 625, 33 N.E. 432; Reagan v ... Farmers' Loan & T. Co. 154 U.S. 420, 38 L.Ed. 1031, ... 4 ... ...
-
In re Assessment of W. Union Tel. Co.
... ... U. Tel. Co., 141 U.S. 40, 11 S. Ct. 889, 35 L. Ed. 628; Maine v. Grand Trunk R. Co., 142 U.S. 217, 12 S. Ct. 121, 163, 35 L. Ed. 994; Pittsburgh C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Backus, 154 U.S. 421, 14 S. Ct. 1114, 38 L. Ed. 1031; Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Backus, 154 U.S. 439, 14 S. Ct ... ...
-
In re Assessment of Western Union Telegraph Co., 1911, 1912
... ... 889, ... 35 L.Ed. 628; Maine v. Grand Trunk R. Co., 142 U.S ... 217, 12 S.Ct. 121, 163, 35 L.Ed. 994; Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Backus, 154 U.S. 421, 14 S.Ct. 1114, 38 ... L.Ed. 1031; Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v ... Backus, 154 U.S. 439, 14 S.Ct. 1122, 38 L.Ed. 1041; ... 576, 40 S.W. 710, 37 L. R. A. 371; ... Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Backus, 133 ... Ind. 513, 33 N.E. 421, 18 L. R. A. 729; Pittsburgh, C., ... C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Backus, 133 Ind. 625, 33 N.E. 432; ... Evansville & I. R. Co. v. West, 138 Ind. 697, 37 ... N.E. 1012; Western ... ...