Plaisance v. John D. Schiller, Jr., D. W. Griffin, Hill K. Louie, William Colvin, David M. Dunwoody, Cornelius Dupré Ii, Kevin Flannery, Scott A. Griffiths, James Lachance, & Uhy LLP

Decision Date14 March 2019
Docket NumberCIVIL ACTION NO. H-17-3741
PartiesKRISTEN PLAISANCE, ROBBIE PLAISANCE, RICHIE CORLEY, CHARLES F. LEEKLEY, BRETT MORRIS, HENRY NEGRETTE, JIM NESBITT, CINDY SPARACINO, RICHARD SPARACINO, CHRISTIAN SCHICK, JACK GOSTL, SANTIAGO CORDOVEZ, FLOYD BONE, TOM HOWLAND, MICHAEL MERNAH, BEN A. SEALE, JOE SHUPAK, MARSHALL WHITMER, BILL WALTERS, ROBERT ROIG, JOSEPH C. ROSSO, and ARTHUR D. SECOR, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN D. SCHILLER, JR., D. WEST GRIFFIN, HILL A FEINBERG, NORMAN M.K. LOUIE, WILLIAM COLVIN, DAVID M. DUNWOODY, CORNELIUS DUPRÉ II, KEVIN FLANNERY, SCOTT A. GRIFFITHS, JAMES LaCHANCE, and UHY LLP, Defendants.
CourtUnited States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Southern District of Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This action is brought by plaintiffs, Kristen Plaisance, Robbie Plaisance, Rickie Corley, Charles F. Leekley, Brett Morris, Henry Negrette, Jim Nesbitt, Cindy Sparacino, Richard Sparacino, Christian Schick, Jock Gostl, Santiago Cordovez, Floyd Bone, Tom Howland, Michael Mernah, Ben A. Seale, Joe Shupak, Marshall Whitmer, Bill Walters, Robert Roig, Joseph C. Rosso, and Arthur D. Secor (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), against defendants, UHY LLP ("UHY"), and ten individual defendants (collectively, "Individual Defendants"): John D. Schiller ("Schiller"), D. West Griffin ("Griffin"), Hill A Feinberg ("Feinberg"), Norman M.K. Louie ("Louie"), William Colvin ("Colvin"), David M. Dunwoody ("Dunwoody"), Cornelius Dupré II ("Dupré"), Kevin Flannery ("Flannery"), Scott A. Griffiths ("Griffiths"), and James LaChance ("LaChance"), for common law fraud and alleged violations of §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78t(a) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, during the period beginning on September 28, 2007, and ending on December 30, 2016, arising from statements and representations regarding Energy XXI Ltd. ("EXXI" or the "Company"). Plaintiffs also assert claims for violations of § 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a), and for breach of fiduciary duty against the Individual Defendants all of whom served as members of EXXI's Board of Directors. Pending before the court are UHY LLP's Motion to Dismiss ("UHY's MD") (Docket Entry No. 101), Defendant D. West Griffin's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint ("Griffin's MD") (Docket Entry No. 102), Defendant Norman M.K. Louie's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint ("Louie's MD") (Docket Entry No. 103), Defendant John D. Schiller, Jr.'s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint ("Schiller's MD") (Docket Entry No. 104), and The Director Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint ("Director Defendants' MD") (Docket EntryNo. 105). For the reasons stated below, the defendants' motions to dismiss will be granted.

I. Procedural History and Alleged Facts

Plaintiffs initiated this action on September 6, 2017, by filing in the Southern District of New York a Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Law, Common Law Fraud, and Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Docket Entry No. 1), asserting claims for fraud and violation of § 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against all defendants, and claims for violation of § 20(a) of the Exchange Act and breach of fiduciary duty against the Individual Defendants. On December 1, 2017, the Southern District of New York entered an Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) transferring the action to this court (Docket Entry No. 52). On February 12, 2018, defendants moved for dismissal (Docket Entry Nos. 85, 86, 89, 93, and 94). On March 29, 2018, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Law, Common Law Fraud, and Breach of Fiduciary Duty ("Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint") (Docket Entry No. 97), in which they reassert the same claims asserted in their initial complaint. On May 18, 2018, defendants filed the pending motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Docket Entry Nos. 101-105). On July 16, 2018, plaintiffs filed responses to each of the pending motions to dismiss (Docket Entry Nos. 111-115), and on August 29, 2018, defendants filed replies in support of their motions to dismiss (Docket Entry Nos. 118-122).

Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint alleges that EXXI was founded by Schiller and Griffin in 2005 to acquire, explore, develop, and operate oil and natural gas properties onshore in Louisiana and Texas and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico Shelf, funded by a $300 million initial public offering of common stock traded on the London Stock Exchange Alternative Investment Market ("AIM").1 Plaintiffs allege that Schiller served as EXXI's President, Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), and member of the Board of Directors ("Board") from the company's inception through and including February 2, 2017, when EXXI announced the termination of Schiller's employment as President, CEO, and member of the Board in a Current Report filed with the SEC on Form 8-K.2 From EXXI's founding in 2005 through and including October 15, 2015, Schiller also served as Chairman of the Board. He was stripped of that title by the Board on October 9, 2015, following an internal investigation that found he borrowed funds from personal acquaintances or their affiliates, some of whom provided services to EXXI or its subsidiaries, and that in 2014 he personally borrowed $3 million from defendant Louie before Louie was appointed to the Board effective December 15, 2014.3 Plaintiffs allege that as EXXI'sBoard Chairman and CEO, Schiller signed the Company's annual reports filed with the SEC on Forms 10-K and 10-K/A.4

Plaintiffs allege that defendant Griffin served as EXXI's Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") and Board member from the Company's inception through and including October 20, 2014, when EXXI announced Griffin's resignation in a press release and a Current Report filed with the SEC on Form 8-K/A on December 1, 2014, following BDO USA, LLP's ("BDO") acquisition of the Texas practice of UHY, which provided independent public accounting services to EXXI.5 Plaintiffs allege that as CFO, Griffin signed EXXI's quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC on Forms 10-Q, 10-K, and 10-K/A, and that Griffin is responsible for the content of the reports that he signed.6

Plaintiffs allege that UHY was engaged to audit EXXI's financial statements and to express an opinion on whether those financial statements fairly presented the financial condition of the Company.7 Specifically, UHY was engaged to audit EXXI's financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014.8 Plaintiffs allege that each audit opinion contained UHY's opinion that it audited EXXI's financial statements "inaccordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)" (the "PCAOB"),9 that it "plan[ned] and perform[ed] the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects,"10 and that each audit stated: "'In our opinion Energy XXI (Bermuda) Limited and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting' for the year in question."11

Plaintiffs allege that in addition to serving on EXXI's Board, defendant Colvin was Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nomination and Governance Committee;12 defendant Flannery was a member of the Audit Committee and the Nomination and Governance Committee;13 defendant Dunwoody was Chairman of the Remuneration Committee and a member of the Audit Committee;14 defendant Griffiths served on the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee;15 defendant Feinberg was Lead Independent Director, Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee, a member of the CompensationCommittee, and an ex officio member of the Audit Committee;16 and defendant Dupré was Chairman of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nomination and Governance Committee.17

Plaintiffs allege that between 2006 and 2010, EXXI completed five major acquisitions for aggregate cash consideration of approximately $2.5 billion of borrowed funds: (1) Marlin Energy, L.L.C. ("Marlin") in February 2006 for approximately $448.4 million; (2) certain Louisiana Gulf Coast producing properties from affiliates of Castex Energy, Inc. ("Castex Properties") in June 2006 for approximately $312.5 million; (3) certain Gulf of Mexico shelf properties from Pogo Producing Company ("Pogo Properties") in June 2007 for approximately $415.1 million; (4) certain Gulf of Mexico shelf oil and natural gas interests from MitEnergy Upstream LLC, a subsidiary of Mitsui & Co., Ltd. ("MitEnergy Interests") in November 2009 for $276.2 million; and (5) certain shallow water Gulf of Mexico shelf oil and natural gas interests from affiliates of Exxon Mobil Corporation ("ExxonMobil Acquisition") in December 2010 for $1.01 billion.18

Plaintiffs allege that on July 31, 2007, following EXXI's acquisition of the Pogo Properties in June of 2007, EXXI announced that in addition to trading on the AIM in London, its common stockwas approved for trading in the United States on the NASDAQ national exchange.19 Plaintiffs allege that on August 12, 2011, EXXI's common stock was listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "EXXI."20 Plaintiffs allege that because many institutional investors are prohibited from investing in companies that do not meet certain minimum requirements such as the requirements needed to be listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market exchange, listing thereon gave EXXI greater access to capital and increased market liquidity.21 Plaintiffs assert their belief that after a reasonable opportunity for discovery, evidence will show that but for EXXI's use of cash flow hedge accounting, EXXI would not have met the minimum requirements for listing on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.22

Plaintiffs allege that from 2010 to 2013 EXXI made optimistic and positive...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT