Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Daugaard, CIV. 11–4071–KES.

Decision Date30 June 2011
Docket NumberNo. CIV. 11–4071–KES.,CIV. 11–4071–KES.
Citation799 F.Supp.2d 1048
PartiesPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA, NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH DAKOTA, and Carol E. Ball, M.D., Plaintiffs, v. Dennis DAUGAARD, Governor, Marty Jackley, Attorney General, Doneen Hollingsworth, Secretary of Health, Department of Health, and Robert Ferrell, President, Board of Medical and Osteopathic Examiners, in their official capacities, Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of South Dakota
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Motion granted in part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Little Rock Family Planning Servs. v. Rutledge
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas
    • August 6, 2019
    ...burden analysis the Eighth Circuit applied in Miller . See Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Daugaard , 799 F. Supp. 2d 1048 (D. S.D. 2011) (Schreier, J.) (noting that "[i]f the plurality opinion in Casey intended ‘large fraction’ to mean a majority, it would have ......
  • Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Reynolds ex rel. State
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • June 29, 2018
    ...an 18-hour waiting period and an ultrasound before obtaining abortion) (appeal pending); Planned Parenthood of Minn., N.D., S.D. v. Daugaard , 799 F.Supp.2d 1048, 1065–66 (D.S.D. 2011) (concluding South Dakota's 72-hour delay was an undue burden); see also June Med. Servs. v. Gee , 280 F.Su......
  • Temple v. Horses
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Dakota
    • February 19, 2016
    ...the likelihood of success on the merits; and (4) the public interest.” Planned Parenthood Minnesota, N. Dakota, S. Dakota v. Daugaard , 799 F.Supp.2d 1048, 1053 (D.S.D.2011) (citing Dataphase , 640 F.2d at 113 ). “[W]hen weighing these factors to determine whether the extraordinary relief o......
  • MKB Mgmt. Corp. v. Burdick
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • October 28, 2014
    ...abortion could easily render that procedure unavailable. See, e.g., Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Daugaard, 799 F.Supp.2d 1048, 1065 (D.S.D.2011). No legislative requirement that only adds cost and requires unnecessary medication can withstand strict scrutiny.c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT