Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds
| Docket Number | 20-0804 |
| Decision Date | 30 June 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds ex rel. State
...L.L.C. , 881 N.W.2d 433, 445 (Iowa 2016) ). Constitutional claims are reviewed de novo. Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds (PPH III ), 962 N.W.2d 37, 45 (Iowa 2021). "In reviewing constitutional challenges to statutes, ‘we must remember that statutes are cloaked with a pr......
-
Garrison v. New Fashion Pork LLP
...constitutional challenges to social and regulatory statutes under the inalienable rights clause. See Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds , 962 N.W.2d 37, 46 (Iowa 2021) (applying rational basis review to a constitutional challenge under both the inalienable rights and equa......
-
State Pub. Defender v. Amaya
..., 2009 Iowa Acts ch. 119, § 3 (codified at Iowa Code § 692A.103 (Supp. 2009)), as recognized in Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc., v. Reynolds , 962 N.W.2d 37, 46 (Iowa 2021) ). Statutes "are cloaked with a strong presumption of constitutionality" and any challenger must prove uncon......
-
Lime Lounge, LLC v. City of Des Moines
...and the relationship of the classification to its goal is not so attenuated as to render the distinction arbitrary or irrational." Id. (quoting Varnum, 763 N.W.2d at The City has a legitimate purpose in imposing a CUP on specific businesses selling alcohol and not others. Zoning decisions b......