Plaza Apartment Hotel Corp. v. Hague

Decision Date20 October 1924
Docket NumberNo. 78.,78.
Citation126 A. 421
PartiesPLAZA APARTMENT HOTEL CORPORATION v. HAGUE et al.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Mandamus by the State, on the relation of the Plaza Apartment Hotel Corporation, against Frank Hague and others, as Board of Commissioners of City of Jersey City, and John Saul, as Superintendent of Buildings. From a judgment overruling demurrer to alternative writ and awarding peremptory writ, respondents appeal. Affirmed.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed:

"This case comes before the court on a demurrer to an alternative writ of mandamus.

"The relator is the owner of property, on which are five brick five-story buildings, on the westerly side of Hudson county boulevard. It applied for a building permit to alter its property, so that stores may be erected therein, which application was refused, for the reason that the city ordinance zoned this property as a residential zone from which stores were excluded.

"It appears that the ordinance in question is founded upon chapter 229 of P. L. 1920.

"We think that the decision of this case, so far as this court is concerned, is controlled by Ignaciunas v. Risley (N. J. Sup.) 121 A. 783, and under the authority thereof a peremptory writ of mandamus should issue.

"The demurrer will be overruled and judgment given for the relator, with costs, and a peremptory writ of mandamus awarded."

Thomas J. Brogan, of Jersey City, for appellants.

Gross & Gross, of Jersey City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court

For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, the CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, and LLOYD, and Judges WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, and KAYS.

For reversal: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • The State ex rel. Oliver Cadillac Co. v. Christopher
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 27 de setembro de 1927
    ... ... Risley (N. J. L.), 121 ... A. 783; Plaza Apartment Hotel Corp. v. Hague (N ... J.), 126 A. 421; ... ...
  • Howden v. Mayor & Aldermen of Savannah
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 11 de junho de 1931
    ... ... that no church or hotel has been built on any lot fronting on ... the park ... and is still used as such; that no hospital or apartment ... house has been built on any lots fronting on Park ... 628, 123 S.E. 590, 38 A.L.R. 1490; Plaza Apartment Hotel ... Corp. v. Hague, 100 N. J. Law, 410, ... ...
  • Greenberg v. Ford
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 9 de junho de 1925
    ...present case falls clearly within the decisions in Ignaciunas v. Nutley (N. J. Err. & App.) 125 A. 121, and Plaza Apartment Hotel Corporation v. Hague (N. J. Err. & App.) 126 A. 421, and other cases of like import. A peremptory writ of mandamus will be awarded. The defendants may apply, if ......
  • Hepburn v. N. Jersey Dist. Water Supply Comm'n
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 20 de outubro de 1924

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT