Pleasant Ridge Townhouses Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. T & D Const. Corp.

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtBefore SULLIVAN
CitationPleasant Ridge Townhouses Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. v. T & D Const. Corp., 581 N.Y.S.2d 857, 181 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Decision Date30 March 1992
PartiesPLEASANT RIDGE TOWNHOUSES HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. T & D CONSTRUCTION CORP., et al., Defendants, Town of Mount Pleasant, Respondent.

Frank T. D'Onofrio, Jr., Hartsdale, for appellant.

Wiener & Catlett, Nanuet (Renaud T. Bleecker and William J. Rada, of counsel), for respondent.

Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and ROSENBLATT, MILLER and SANTUCCI, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for the defective construction of a townhouse community, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), entered December 14, 1989, which granted the motion of the defendant Town of Mount Pleasant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In or about late January 1988 the plaintiff homeowners' association commenced this action against, inter alia, the Town of Mount Pleasant. The plaintiff filed a notice of claim against the Town in September 1987, averring that the Town had negligently permitted its townhouse community to be constructed with an improperly designed drainage system, in violation of State and local building codes, causing extensive flooding on the property. The Town moved to dismiss on the ground that both the notice of claim and the commencement of the action were untimely. The Town argued that the plaintiff's claim accrued on November 21, 1983, nearly four years before the notice of claim was filed, when the town granted permission to construct the development. The plaintiff argued that its claim did not accrue until July 3, 1987, the date on which its engineer issued a report revealing the cause of the flooding. The Supreme Court, Westchester County, found that the plaintiff's claim accrued, at the latest, on July 7, 1986, the date on which the last certificate of occupancy was issued by the Town. Thus, the court found that the notice of claim and the commencement of the action were untimely and dismissed the complaint insofar as it was asserted against the Town.

General Municipal Law § 50-i requires that an action against a municipality to recover damages for personal injury or property damage be commenced within one year and 90 days from the "happening of the event upon which the claim is based" (General Municipal Law § 50-i[1]; see, Klein v. City of Yonkers, 73 A.D.2d...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Merritt v. Hooshang Const., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 26, 1995
    ... ... 73 A.D.2d 931, 423 N.Y.S.2d 685; Pleasant Ridge Townhouses Homeowners' Assn. v. T & D r. Corp., 181 A.D.2d 871, 581 ... N.Y.S.2d 857; Matter ... ...
  • Okie v. Village of Hamburg
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 11, 1994
    ...73 A.D.2d 931, 423 N.Y.S.2d 685, aff'd 53 N.Y.2d 1011, 442 N.Y.S.2d 477, 425 N.E.2d 865; Pleasant Ridge Townhouses Homeowners' Assn. v. T & D Constr. Corp., 181 A.D.2d 871, 581 N.Y.S.2d 857; Matter of Magaldino v. Town of Hurley, 177 A.D.2d 906, 576 N.Y.S.2d 664; McVan v. City of New Rochel......
  • Demasi v. Dutchess Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Works
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 5, 2012
    ...255 A.D.2d 436, 680 N.Y.S.2d 595;Johnson v. Marianetti, 202 A.D.2d 970, 609 N.Y.S.2d 494;Pleasant Ridge Townhouses Homeowners' Assn. v. T & D Constr. Corp., 181 A.D.2d 871, 581 N.Y.S.2d 857;Nebbia v. County of Monroe, 92 A.D.2d 724, 461 N.Y.S.2d 127). Therefore, as measured from the date of......
  • Liston v. Town of Newburgh
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 20, 2011
    ...970–971, 609 N.Y.S.2d 494; Scarzfava v. City of Newburgh, 255 A.D.2d 436, 680 N.Y.S.2d 595; Pleasant Ridge Townhouses Homeowners' Assn. v. T & D Constr. Corp., 181 A.D.2d 871, 872, 581 N.Y.S.2d 857; Nebbia v. County of Monroe, 92 A.D.2d 724, 461 N.Y.S.2d 127). Accordingly, as measured from ......
  • Get Started for Free