Pleasants v. United States, 43278.
Decision Date | 04 April 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 43278.,43278. |
Citation | 22 F. Supp. 964,86 Ct. Cl. 679 |
Parties | PLEASANTS v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Claims Court |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Frederick Schwertner, of Washington, D. C. (Delafield, Thorne & Marsh, of New York City, Lowenhaupt, Waite & Stolar, of St. Louis, Mo., George H. Warrington, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Wright & Rundle, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for plaintiff.
Frederick E. S. Morrison, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Drinker, Biddle & Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), amicus curiæ.
John A. Rees, of Washington, D. C., and James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Robert N. Anderson and Fred K. Dyar, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.
Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and GREEN, LITTLETON, WILLIAMS, and WHALEY, Judges.
All of the sections hereinafter mentioned are found in the Revenue Act of 1932, unless otherwise stated. Section 23 (n), 26 U.S.C.A. § 23(n) and note, relating to charitable contributions, which is in substance the same as the provisions covering that subject incorporated in all the revenue acts beginning with section 1201(2) of the Revenue Act of October 3, 1917, 40 Stat. 330 provides as follows:
Section 21, 26 U.S.C.A. § 21 and note, provides that the "`Net income' means the gross income computed under section 22, less the deductions allowed by section 23." Sections 11 and 12 relating to the tax on individuals impose a normal tax of 4 and 8 per cent. and a surtax ranging from 1 to 40 per cent. "upon the net income of every individual."
The question in this case is whether "the taxpayer's net income" mentioned in section 23(n), quoted above, means the net income which the statute subjects to the tax imposed by sections 11 and 12 — that is, the net amount upon which the taxpayer is liable for a tax, except for its reduction for charitable contributions — or whether "the taxpayer's net income," which section 23(n) makes the base for the calculation of the allowable deductions for charitable contributions, means the taxpayer's gross income less the deductions allowed by section 23 ( ) plus the deduction of the capital net loss which is not a permissible or allowable deduction under section 23 or any other section in determining "the net income" to be subjected to the tax imposed by sections 11 and 12, except under certain circumstances not material here, but which will hereinafter be referred to. It is our opinion that the net income specified in section 23(n) as the base for the calculation of the deduction for charitable contributions is, and was, intended by Congress to be the net amount upon which the taxpayer is taxable under sections 11 and 12 — i. e., $94,963.52. This was plaintiff's gross income less all permissible deductions. Where there is a "capital net loss" as defined by the statute, such loss, by express provision of the statute, is excluded and denied as a deduction in determining the net income to be subjected to the tax imposed. See section 101(c) (7), 26 U.S.C.A. § 101 note. The pertinent sections of the Revenue Act of 1932, so far as material here, are as follows:
26 U.S.C.A. § 11 note.
26 U.S.C.A. § 12 note.
26 U.S.C.A. § 21 and note.
26 U.S.C.A. § 22 and note.
26 U.S.C.A. § 23 and note.
"(8) `Capital assets' means property held by the taxpayer for more than two years (whether or not connected with his trade or business), but does not include stock in trade of the taxpayer or other property of a kind which would properly be included in the inventory of the taxpayer if on hand at the close of the taxable year, or property held by the taxpayer primarily for sale in the course of his trade or business." 26 U.S.C.A. § 101 note. (Italics supplied.)
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue held in his construction of sections 23(n) and 101 which, so far as this question is concerned, are the same as the related sections of the Revenue Acts of 1924, §§ 214, 208, 43 Stat. 269, 262, 1926, §§ 214, 208, 44 Stat. 26, 19, and 1928, § 23(n), 101, 26 U.S.C.A. § 23(n) and note, § 101 note, that if a taxpayer sustained a capital net loss which by express provision of the statute could not be taken as a deduction in computing taxable net income, such capital net loss must nevertheless be deducted from the net income which the statute specified should be subjected to the normal and surtaxes imposed by sections 11 and 12 in arriving at the net income for the purpose of applying the 15 per cent. limitation prescribed by ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Singer Company v. United States
...Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 301 U.S. 379, 57 S.Ct. 813, 81 L.Ed. 1169 (1937); Pleasants v. United States, 22 F.Supp. 964, 86 Ct.Cl. 679 (1938), aff'd 305 U.S. 357, 59 S.Ct. 281, 83 L.Ed. 217 (1939). Therefore, the definition of a gift, plaintiff asserts, as app......
-
New World Life Ins. Co. v. United States
...93, 55 S.Ct. 50, 79 L.Ed. 211. Cf. United States v. Pleasants, 59 S.Ct. 281, 83 L.Ed. ___, decided January 3, 1939, Pleasants v. United States, 22 F.Supp. 964, 86 Ct.Cl. 679. The present regulations as amended by T.D. 4615, supra, are not inconsistent with our conclusion that health and acc......
-
United States v. Pleasants
...filed his claim for a refund and on its rejection brought this suit in the Court of Claims. Judgment was rendered in his favor. 22 F.Supp. 964. Because of an asserted conflict with decisions of Circuit Courts of Appeals2 and with our ruling in Helvering v. Bliss, 293 U.S. 144, 55 S.Ct. 17, ......
-
Merrill v. United States
...sections 11 and 12. We do not believe the cases of Helvering v. Bliss, 293 U.S. 144, 55 S.Ct. 17, 79 L.Ed. 246, and Pleasants v. United States, 22 F. Supp. 964, 86 Ct.Cl. 679, affirmed 305 U.S. 357, 59 S.Ct. 281, 83 L.Ed. 217, require a different result in this case. Those cases, relied upo......