Plumb v. Bank of Enterprise
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Kansas |
Citation | 48 Kan. 484,29 P. 699 |
Parties | CARRIE S. PLUMB, as Executrix of the estate of P. B. Plumb, deceased, et al., v. THE BANK OF ENTERPRISE |
Decision Date | 09 April 1892 |
29 P. 699
48 Kan. 484
CARRIE S. PLUMB, as Executrix of the estate of P. B. Plumb, deceased, et al.,
v.
THE BANK OF ENTERPRISE
Supreme Court of Kansas
April 9, 1892
Error from Dickinson District Court.
THE opinion states the nature of the action and the material facts. Judgment for the plaintiff Bank at the May term, 1889. The defendant, Plumb, brings the case to this court.
Judgment affirmed.
T. N. Sedgwick, for plaintiffs in error.
John H. Mahan, for defendant in error.
JOHNSTON, J. All the Justices concurring.
OPINION [29 P. 700]
JOHNSTON, J.:
This was a proceeding to enforce the individual liability of the several stockholders of the Kansas Harvester [48 Kan. 485] Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Kansas. On October 12, 1888, the Bank of Enterprise recovered a judgment against the Kansas Harvester Company for $ 1,339.06, and execution was at once issued upon the judgment, and the return of the same, made October 23, 1888, disclosed the fact that the company had no property whereon to levy, and was in fact insolvent. Steps were then taken to obtain an execution against the property of Preston B. Plumb and other stockholders of the Kansas Harvester Company, and upon a hearing had on July 2, 1889, it was found that at the time of the rendition of the judgment against the corporation Preston B. Plumb held stock of the corporation in the sum of $ 1,350, which was fully paid up, and that he was liable to the bank upon the stock for the full sum of $ 1,350, and execution was accordingly authorized to be issued against the property of Plumb. Exceptions were taken to the findings and order of the court, and P. B. Plumb having departed this life since proceedings in error were begun, upon the consent of parties an order of revivor has been made, by which Carrie S. Plumb, executrix, and Amos H. Plumb, executor, of the estate of P. B. Plumb, deceased, have become plaintiffs in error.
The questions presented for review are few and easily solved. It is conceded that P. B. Plumb purchased the stock of the corporation, as claimed, and his individual liability to the extent of the stock held by him is not denied, providing he did not divest himself of liability by a transfer of the stock before the judgment was obtained. It was shown upon the hearing that certificates in the corporation were issued to P. B. Plumb, which he held until April or May, 1888, when he assigned and delivered the certificates of stock to Richard A. Elmer, of New York, who was then solvent and abundantly able to meet any liability that could arise against him as a stockholder in the Kansas Harvester Company. No transfer of the shares of stock was made upon the books of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hancock Nat. Bank v. Ellis
...... 759; Wells v. Robb, 43 Kan. 201, 23 P. 148;. Abbey v. Dry-Goods Co., 44 Kan. 415, 24 P. 426;. Abbey v. Long, 44 Kan. 688, 24 P. 1111; Plumb v. Bank, 48 Kan. 484, 29 P. 699; Hoyt v. Bunker,. 50 Kan. 574, 32 P. 126; Howell v. Bank, 52 Kan. 133,. 34 P. 395; Van Demark v. Barons, Id. 779, ......
-
Hancock Nat. Bank v. Ellis
...v. Robb, 43 Kan. 201, 23 Pac. 148;Abbey v. Dry–Goods Co., 44 Kan. 415, 24 Pac. 426;Abbey v. Long, 44 Kan. 688, 24 Pac. 1111;Plumb v. Bank, 48 Kan. 484, 29 Pac. 699;Hoyt v. Bunker, 50 Kan. 574, 32 Pac. 126;Howell v. Bank, 52 Kan. 133, 34 Pac. 395;Van Demark v. Barons, Id. 779, 35 Pac. 798;Ac......
-
Basting v. Northern Trust Company
...... which may waive it. Cook, Stock & Stockh. § 258; Beach,. Priv. Corp. § 131; Bank of Commerce v. Bank of. Newport, 11 C. C. A. 484, 63 F. 898; Isham v. Buckingham, 49 N.Y. 216; ... v. Tenth N. Bank, 46 N.Y. 325; New York & N. H. R. Co. v. Schuyler, 34 N.Y. 30; Plumb v. Bank of. Enterprise, 48 Kan. 484, 29 P. 699; Glenn v. Garth, 133 N.Y. 18, 30 N.E. 649, and 31 ......
-
Schultz v. United Telephone Co.
......According to. plaintiff's evidence, the husband was rather lacking in. enterprise and inclined to let his wife earn the living. He. had the habit of coming to her for money and was ... a safety deposit box in the Farmers' National Bank in. Salina. Elizabeth said that was a good place for it, and that. she was to draw the dividends ... rule upon the point whether a gift of unindorsed corporate. stock is valid, but see Plumb v. Bank, 48 Kan. 484,. 29 P. 699; 28 C. J. 658, nor on the question whether a. corporation is ......